Imagine thinking a fish can slowly become a cow through "random mutations". Imagine thinking DNA and cells are all the results of random process lol
Imagine thinking a fish can slowly become a cow through "random mutations".
Imagine thinking a fish can slowly become a cow through "random mutations". Imagine thinking DNA and cells are all the results of random process lol
The way mares enjoy human co... mpany, its all the evidence i need natural selection is legit
No one says evolution is random... things evolve for reasons, those reasons centering around survival and reproduction.
Imagine thinking a brick can become a building
Imagine being a brainlet who thinks that anything he can't understand is magic sky man lol
Imagine jumping straight to the made up shitstian god when life was engineered by the annunaki
imagining dismissing the existence of an imaginary sky person while believing in different imaginary sky people
>imaginary sky people
>he doesn’t know
go back to /x/
If you always assume your conclusion must be correct before you even start looking at evidence and research, you won't learn anything. The theory of evolution was molded around our understanding of reality, not the other way around.
Explain how eyes were formed then. Random mutation caused some animal to magically see and that's it?
No. Random mutation of cells that can detect light.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_eye
>inbr "tldr" or "muh wikipedia"
The pathway to optical organs is so straightforward that it evolved independently multiple times. Light sensitive organelles exist in even single celled organisms, and in more complex multicellular yet still microscopic organisms, having multiple light detectors around the body to sense direction is a common innovation. As organisms got bigger, light patches had to get denser and larger, which had the benefit of being able to then detect movement of light intensity across the patch. Some species put their patches on a concave surface to amplify this effect, which makes it truly directionally sensitive. These got deeper and rounder, giving better directional selectivity until just a pinhole was left since the optics work out that the smaller the aperture on a lensless system, the sharper the image. Of course now there's a pocket on the surface of the organism which can't be maintained easily, so a film membrane would have been formed to protect it, and over time both this membrane and the cavity fluid would develop into a lens system.
Each step along the way is small, and provides pretty dramatic improvements. Just making the light patch bigger, or deepening the surface it sits on a little bit, significantly improves the utility of the organ. Creationists point at eyes because they themselves can't fathom how they function, but they are actually pretty simple organs.
didn’t read
Stay ignorant
It’s fine, nobody read the Bible either
Evolution isn't even that implausable but
>abiogenesis
>umm actually life just randomly appears in water with chemicals in it, even though we've never seen it happen, it's just really rare okay?
Self sustaining chemical reactions happen naturally sometimes and making really intricate ones takes just a few sloppy steps in a lab. It's so trivial, that we've successfully simulated spontaneous self replicating lipid membrane formation out of nothing but the shit which existed in the lifeless primordial soup.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27378100/
But they are.