How does this make you feel as a pet owner?

How does this make you feel as a pet owner?

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    pets are property so its correct to say destroyed

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I would value most dogs over some of the things they want us to accept as "other people" actually. Can we say they're property when we can arrange hominids in the hierarchy correctly and maybe describe them as first grade property, one of the highest? Maybe put pitbulls down as second grade property, next to anyone who turns 25 while remaining a virgin (forced labor paid with being allowed to live in society at all).

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    nothing makes me happier than seeing shitbulls get ventilated
    good on the UK cuckcops for killing such unsightly beast
    >NOOOO ITS NOT A PITBULL ITS A [insert whatever breed name you feel like today] WAAAAHHHH WHY DID YOU SHOOT IT!!! WAAAAHHHHHH

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Obviously pits. Link to video? I like watching pits get what they deserve.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    EPIC JOKES FOR MINECRAFTERS
    >Have you heard about the dogs that met Tower Hamlet Police?

    >They were destroyed!!!!

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >DESTROYED AT THE SCENE
    and because they're noguns over there they must've just beaten the dogs to death

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Based

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Roy Sheriff sounds like a trigger happy coward.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >What’s the policy, if it ain’t white shoot it?
      Imagine if it was

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It already is

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Mailmen should be allowed to shoot dogs if cops can. Mailmen get attacked way more too

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >no person was taken to hospital
    i dont see how it was necessary to kill them. Why cant the police handle aggressive dogs?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They did handle them, though. Those dogs aren't gonna be aggressive ever again. How should the police have handled the situation instead?

      UK has a law against dangerous dogs. In their law, a dangerous dog is defined as a dog that simply appears "dangerously out of control". It doesn't have to actually hurt anyone; it merely has to look like it might hurt someone. Menacing behavior is often a precursor of an impending bite, and the law intends to be a preventative measure against dog attacks.
      The country also has legislation that targets fighting breeds. You're not supposed to own a pit bull at all in the UK. If you do have an exempted dog, it still has to wear a muzzle in public places (which those two dogs did not have). Exempted pit bulls are also legally required to have a "fit and proper person" as their owner (the guy on the video didn't seem like one to me).
      For further context, there have been 19 fatal dog attacks in the UK between 2020 and 2023. There were only 11 fatal attacks between 2000 and 2009. The frequency of severe dog attacks is rising. People are losing their patience with aggressive dogs for a reason.

      It looked like the police were intending to sieze the animals, but the owner refused to co-operate. He let go of his dogs and allowed them to commit suicide by cop.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >destroyed
    Idk if the shooting was justified but that's a poor choice of words

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It makes me feel great, it's a shame they didn't shoot the owner

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Destroyed

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Frick the cops. Worthless shits

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    it's just a shame the incident didn't result in a mutual neutralization
    frick shitbulls and frick cops

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Disregarding this case's specifics

    The "destroyed" terminology is disturbing.
    I know pets are considered property by most or all states, and that is the reason they say destroyed vs killed. But those same states have animal abuse laws which wouldn't hesitate to say "killed" or "tortured" in the case of a citizen getting caught brutally torturing a random duck they grabbed out of the local pond.

    I've seen instances where pets were allowed to escape out of cars and houses whenever the owner was innocently or guiltily accused and forced to exit with their hands up, where little dogs were shot by cops that couldn't kill you if they tried. That I am not okay with though I don't know how leos could handle the former.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Blue lives matter, more than yours, and definitely more than everything you hold dear

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What a bootlicking homosexual, holy shit. Are you a bong? Because that would br even more pathetic.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        actual projection right here

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'd walk over to the pitbull and stomp on it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Media outlets are terrified of making cops look bad; that's why it's always shit like "Man dies after police enter wrong house" and never "Police murder innocent man".

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      "Destroyed" terminology is used to refer to justified euthanasia, usually as comeuppance for attacking a person. Or in the case of backwards post-modern liberal shitholes like the commonwealth, a guinea pig, an "outdoor rat", a cat, a pigeon, etc.

      So they used it to make it sound justified, not like a leashed dog moved too quickly and got shot by an america tier cop.

      it's just a shame the incident didn't result in a mutual neutralization
      frick shitbulls and frick cops

      They banned guns specifically because they were already planning on a lot of people having just cause to engage in mutual neutralization

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      "Destroyed" terminology is used to refer to justified euthanasia, usually as comeuppance for attacking a person. Or in the case of backwards post-modern liberal shitholes like the commonwealth, a guinea pig, an "outdoor rat", a cat, a pigeon, etc.

      So they used it to make it sound justified, not like a leashed dog moved too quickly and got shot by an america tier cop.

      [...]
      They banned guns specifically because they were already planning on a lot of people having just cause to engage in mutual neutralization

      https://i.imgur.com/jpXHrzo.jpg

      Destroyed

      https://i.imgur.com/e5Rbmtt.jpg

      >destroyed
      Idk if the shooting was justified but that's a poor choice of words

      “Destroyed”

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        have a nice day immediately

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Kill the shitbull owners, then stomp on the shitbull's head until it's salsa.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Out of curiosity, what was the dogs' breed?

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Cat in blender >

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Content, I don't plan on sicking my pal on cop's anytime soon.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I bet they were "staffordshires, not pitbulls", german shepherds, rottweilers, or otherwise contaminated with an such an undesirable creature or even wolfdog DNA from those shithead breeders in central europe.

    Knowing bongs, probably a "pitbu-.... terrier mix"

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Out of curiosity, what was the dogs' breed?

      shitbulls
      https://twitter.com/UnityNewsNet/status/1655676944631885826

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Good riddance

        Or at least its funny until you realize they'd do the same to a golden retriever in the name of equality

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Shitbulls aside, shoot was absolutely unjust and completely unnecessary. Guy releases the shitbull into the pole catcher's catch pole as agreed, and a jumpy peeler thinks he set it loose and gets trigger happy. You can clear as fricking day see the shitbull was at pole's length from the catcher, with it's head going straight into the noose upon release.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Source me up, buttholes.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          See

          https://i.imgur.com/mfFVSJQ.png

          Shitbulls aside, shoot was absolutely unjust and completely unnecessary. Guy releases the shitbull into the pole catcher's catch pole as agreed, and a jumpy peeler thinks he set it loose and gets trigger happy. You can clear as fricking day see the shitbull was at pole's length from the catcher, with it's head going straight into the noose upon release.

          They want to arrest the guy but need to get the dogs in a catch pole first. 1 minute of police antagonizing the frick out of the shitbulls by while they just bark. Owner actually manages to completely calm them down and get them submissive until police move aggressively as a unit to set them off again. Owner agrees with pole catcher to let a shitbull directly into his catch pole. It 'lunges' straight INTO the catch pole, now under control, but a jumpy homosexual peeler somehow thinks he set the dog loose to attack and shoots it. Everyone watching from their apartments are pissed off. Video ends before they shoot the second one.

          Video only serves to make shitbulls look good and peelers look bad. The shitbulls didn't do anything in this video that literally any other dogs would in the situation.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The owner was a gigantic moron they should have shot him too after they were done with the dogs

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *