How am i supposed to actually believe in this shit when they can't even figure out how it would be physically possible for this thing to walk and...

How am i supposed to actually believe in this shit when they can't even figure out how it would be physically possible for this thing to walk and only come up with increasingly retarded excuses that get debunked each time?

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Another thread that solely exists for the dinosaur samefag to argue with himself

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Still can't believe that "spinosaurus couldn't even swim!!" paper was based on a model that excluded like a third of the body.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Life uhh finds a way

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    they have only found 30% of a specimen. they are just making shit up based on a few vertebrae just like they always do

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They had a symbiotic relationship with Sauropods. When a sauropod walked into a body of water, they would swim onto their backs. Once on the sauropod, they could eat leaves from mid height trees. Why were the sauropods okay with it? They thought they were cute. The female sauropods selected for males with a spinosaurus friend because they seemed like good dads.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    said evolution denying creationist.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      But Spinosaurus disproves creationism cause no god would ever make this shit

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        God has a sense of humor, why do you think He broke off a whole continent for the marsupials?

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    that's an old model, it looks much more normal now, just with smaller legs.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >with smaller legs.
      so it looks even less plausible?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        my b same size legs as that img

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          So what are the actual changes other than the paddle tail

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It beinga quadruped is not supported anymore

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I know but it still begs the question of how something like this even walked outside the water

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                It swam
                upside down
                the sail was a rudder

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I can see this being in next year's paper

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Flight will probably come sooner

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Spinosaurus lived in pairs that stayed together for life just like birds.
                Once they reached maturity, they would lock their forearms together, hence their small wrists that were actually atrophying. With their arms firmly locked in, they'd throw themselves off cliffs together and each member of the pair would simultaneously start contracting their lumbar muscles, moving the sail, and allowing for them to bat their backs.
                Like this, they could fly for hours and actually migrated a cross the world.
                They also raped kids

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >They also raped kids
                They truly were prehistoric ducks

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >It beinga quadruped is not supported anymore
              It never was supported. The wrists would never support that much weight.

              https://i.imgur.com/6NuAzXV.png

              How am i supposed to actually believe in this shit when they can't even figure out how it would be physically possible for this thing to walk and only come up with increasingly retarded excuses that get debunked each time?

              >How am i supposed to actually believe in this shit
              nobody cares what you believe. Your beliefs don't matter. Believe what you want.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                wow bro, you are so badass
                when I grow up I wanna be just like you

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >The wrists would never support that much weight.
                True
                And what about those miniscule legs that have to support a 6 ton animal

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >And what about those miniscule legs that have to support a 6 ton animal
                Not a problem. Those legs support Spinosaurus in a bipedal stance no problem, it just wouldn’t be a great runner. Needs more ass meat though (caudofemoralis longus).

                Remember that the front half of these animals are heavily pneumatic, so they look more unbalanced than they really are.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Well guess you just have to cope with being wrong then, a recent measurement of the thigh bone of the 2014 chimera showed that it would support a 1.5 tonne animal. It would literally snap in half if it tried to stand on those legs. The real question is how this model was ever allowed to become mainstream when it is obvious that it is wrong.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >The real question is how this model was ever allowed to become mainstream when it is obvious that it is wrong.
                Dinofags don't tend to actually questions what they're presented with as long as it contradicts what Jurassic Park depicted

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >noooo not my childhood kinerinooo

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                T.rex was featherless
                Spinosaurus couldn't have walked on toothpick legs
                Seethe

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You're more into your idea about dinosaurs than actually understanding anything about them. Just switch to monsters like in monster hunter. You'll be much happier since you won't constantly be bitching about science. It's incredibly annoying how many people love to flex their handful of brain cells by arguing about things they're obviously ignorant about. You don't have the knowledge to talk about this on anything but a shallow as dirt level. Wait until you come up with retarded excuses about how you're so much more intelligent you are than paleontologists. That's always funny.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Keep screaming featherpedo, you're fighting against actual fact

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Much more realistic with no* legs

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *