>*Does nothing for nearly half a billion years*

>*Does nothing for nearly half a billion years*
Holy based.

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that Horseshoe crabs are on the brink of extinction due to literal blood sucking Americans who cannot into modern medicine.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    apparently i started a shitshow by correcting a turd
    be sorry for being wrong

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Its God's favorite favorite animal, afterall

    Unbothered, unchanged, perpetually chill

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Estimated 8.7 million species
      >Born as a human of all things
      >Not born as a horseshoe crab

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What does it take to have keep these little frens as pets?

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Make thread about horseshoe crab
    >Somehow ends up as a argument about numbers
    You are all extremely gay.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    once you reach max level you stop leveling

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    These things terrify me because of the thought of accidentally stepping on one at the beach and crushing it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You're not gonna crush it, how fragile do you think they are?
      t. accidentally stepped on one and sliced my foot open

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They make great space fighters.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Oh yeah, mr. Krabs!

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Only Wauf could start a thread about a based crab and 90% of the thread be arguments and insults. Never change you lovable autistic homosexuals.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They're not crabs.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes they are, it’s in the name

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      wait what? they return them to the ocean? doesn't being out of water for long periods, or atleast the stress of the whole ordeal, kill them?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I read a book that said the best facilities have a 3-5% death rate. Some sources claim it's as high as 10%.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          What he said

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >this bleeds the crab
      Man frick gatorade

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >this bleeds the crab
      Man frick gatorade

      What does the blood taste like you think?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Pretty sure blue blooded animals are a thing because they have copper in their blood instead of iron, so probably like copper

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The USA is committing genocide

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm not a vegangay but this shit makes me so mad.
      Leave those fricking dinos alone you homosexuals.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's on its way out, a synthetic replacement has been around, but one company had a monopoly on it, so no one used it. A second synthetic replacement is now available so synthetic should start overtaking the blood. The crabs survived the meteor, and they will survive the israelites as well.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >are put in concentration camps for their blue blood

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Them eggs are delicious

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It changed a lot, actually.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Is that its digestive system or parasites?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Gills.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          lol it says anus

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Slinkies

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Humans are definitely horseshoe crab territory at this point right? There's no way natural selection is strong enough to greatly change our form at this point.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      if the theory about ancient thermal maximums being ancient civilizations that got wiped out of the geological record by time is true (it is), and humans aren't going to do any better than the last 2-3 sapient species that industrialized, we have maybe another hundred years before destroying ourselves.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Where do I read more about this?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Mention it as a way to dismiss periods of pre human global warming to climate scientists and the scientific papers will flow.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Where do I read more about this?

        Mention it as a way to dismiss periods of pre human global warming to climate scientists and the scientific papers will flow.

        >>>/x/
        Back to your containment board morons.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    literally me

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You can't beat perfection

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yummy dinosaur innards juice

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    wrong.
    they did many things and such attempts were all broken down by other organisms. they have been trapped in the same niche as a result.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    never mind, you are correct. seems like they would be around billions. i am probably thinking of trilobites..and nope also 500 mil years old. i should be concentrating on biology more

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      500 mil is half a billion
      >i should be concentrating on biology more
      the biology of your own moronation and how to fix it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Billion has more than one definition

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No it doesn't.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Billion has more than one definition

              Kek

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              10^9 = 1,000,000,000

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Nobody uses the second definition except for history buffs, usually in the same paragraph explaining that the meaning has changed.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Frick off, many non-English cultures use it. That's why people here think the US are richer than they are all the time.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What terms do they use for 1^9 then, and why would that not translate outside of computer programmed translations? Or do they say billion for both 1^9 and 1^12, or say one thousand million sort of deal every time? Either of the latter two seems ridiculous to me atm.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                In German it's
                million
                milliarde
                billion
                billiarde
                trillion...

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                As it is in every non moronic language that uses the million root based number names.
                Most asian languages are a different breed of moronation with non recursive systems.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >non moronic
                >16 definite articles
                Uhh you realise that you NEED to pick one right? This kills the germgay

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Also polish and most of the European countries that use the long scale

                What terms do they use for 1^9 then, and why would that not translate outside of computer programmed translations? Or do they say billion for both 1^9 and 1^12, or say one thousand million sort of deal every time? Either of the latter two seems ridiculous to me atm.

                It's not really confusing. Everyone uses the same scale so there are no miscommunications. Except when some dumb frick journalist is not even aware short scale exists, and translates 'trillion' to "trylion" (quintillion in my language).

                Having said that, anyone who claims "billion" has two definitions is a moron. No, we're talking in English and there's only one meaning. It's like saying "pain" has two definitions because it's also "bread" in french.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Is it hard to say one hundred million?
                Why is it harder to say one thousand million?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's not that it's hard, just tedious and inefficient.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                and by that, I mean in the conceptual state. It's easier to comprehend when a different term is made for the next logical step. I assume you understand that and are just playing devil's advocate, though, and am clarifying in hopes to reduce shitposts (a forlorn effort here, I know, and still stupidly do so).

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >It's easier to comprehend when a different term is made for the next logical step.
                So the only reason you are fine with ten million and hundred million but not thousand million is cultural.
                Otherwise you would complain about not having terms for them as well.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There is no such thing as non English cultures. only larpers in denial.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Nobody uses the second definition except for history buffs
                History buffs and most of Europeans, most of central and south Americans and half of Africans...

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Frick short scale.
              Billion = 1 000 000 000 000
              It's a million squared. So power 2. Bi (two) llion.
              Much more logical.
              But I guess it's fitting to use moronic shit.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >But I guess it's fitting to use moronic shit.
                You're speaking English, of course it is. English uses short scale, like it or not. Arguing >bbbbut I meant long scale! just shows you're unfamiliar with which language uses which
                >t. natively uses long scale

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                English is all fashions of moronic.
                Of course I adapt to moronic english when speaking it. That doesn't make it less stupid.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Fricking technicality Nazi is too moronic to see that both definitions mean the exact same thing.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                10^9 and 10^12 are the same?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Google it or read the thread, imbecile

              >two distinct definitions
              >only includes the common definition everyone is aware of

              Imbecile

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >dont just cite an easy to find wikipedia page, spoon feed the whole thing to me
                imbecile

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Ah, the tried and true "I was uhh i was just pretending to be moronic haha!!!"

                Frick off, moron.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Are you pretending you cant look up billion on wikipedia?
                Are you pretending you cant perceive cheekiness?
                Or are you actually moronic?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I-I was being cheeky!!!
                I am not involved in the billion discussion, homosexual, I just needed to call you out. Hilarious that you are tripling down on being a fricking moron instead of just admitting you snipped the wrong definition.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I am not involved in the billion discussion
                Neither am i you giant moron i can just read contextual cues unlike your low iq autistic ass

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >i was just pretending to be an idiot posting the wrong thing!
                Yes, yes, I saw you mention that the first two times, moron. No need to reiterate.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >i was just pretending to be an idiot posting the wrong thing!
                Yes, yes, I saw you mention that the first two times, moron. No need to reiterate.

                I cropped the important part of the image so your 2 iq points dont overheat when you try to process it this time

                Youre welcome

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Sister, it's actually a gorillion.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          murimutt numbers don't count. billion has one definition

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Name one other definition

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Google it or read the thread, imbecile

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              It’s the same thing though

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Do you seriously think
                >1,000x1,000,000
                Is the same thing as
                >1,000,000x1,000,000
                Congrats, you have successfully pretended to be moronic.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Incredible

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/aK7c90b.jpg

          woman moment

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Long-scale v. short-scale is irrelevant here.
          >short-scale
          500 million years.
          >long-scale
          500 000 million years.
          Universe itself isn't even that old. So by any standard, the first anon is wrong.

          never mind, you are correct. seems like they would be around billions. i am probably thinking of trilobites..and nope also 500 mil years old. i should be concentrating on biology more

          Earth is a few 10^9 years old, and life took 10^9 more years to get established.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The biggest threat these little isopods have ever faced is being fished by humans for their blood.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    are you sure it's only that long

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *