Do you think it's abuse to fuck around with animals without physically hurting them? Posted on February 11, 2023 by Anonymous Do you think it's abuse to fuck around with animals without physically hurting them?
does this board not have janitors?
Janitors are for cleaning.
Winking mares are for hugs & fugs.
Not a big fan of dogs. More of a mare enjoyer myself.
winking mares are the best
>trying to shock Wauf with mare vaginas
oh my sweet summer child
pondering what kind of human would find enjoyment from causing displeasure to animals he is supposed to be the caretaker for. Just by going off the posts ITT, anti-social weirdos without friends to talk to. I don't know why I need to explain to the animal board why screaming at a dog at the top of your lungs is abuse despite not physically causing harm.
it's a predictor of anti social personality disorder and most men on Wauf have something deeply wrong with them
>noooo but I'm not killing it!!! I'm just doing everything I can get away with without harming it because-
>it's a predictor of anti social personality disorder
It's not. You are spreading lies.
The only thing that is thought of being a predictor for anti-social personality disorder is torturing animals during childhood/ adolescence.
Most humans have a sadistic nature inside them.
They don't know any better, and as long as you don't hurt them, who cares?
Why does this thread feel so Wauf
Every board on Wauf is slowly becoming more schizo as schizoposters come here and never leave, and normal posters do leave.
>waaaaah staph yoosing deaf fweats DDDD;
>sumwun shuld genocyde yu for nawt wanting tu fuk dogs >:CCCCCC
razor, wirst, post .webm of it, ty. Next response = you officially concede and except everyone here as your undisputed superiors
HE GOT BANNED KEK!!!!
No. I'm just sick of stooping down to the level of people who can't think for themselves.
I understand what's going on, now.
There is no point in arguing about this topic for people who refuse to engage in an honest exchange of thoughts.
>No, I'm *irrelevant gay blabbering*
Anon, using a VPN is against site rules...
be careful anon, you may cut yourself on that edge.
and get out of your moms basement and seek therapy, you seriously need it.
Guys there’s a difference between a little trolling and psychological abuse.
Sum lady found my friends dog. The lady cut the dog's(Riley) hair and won't give it back. We know what complex she lives in but not the Apt number. Suggestions?
No of course not. I think it's an abuse if you factory farm them, not if you e-boitrolu your dog. To people that think such: get a grip about what matters in life.
What is there were gods who would troll us by inflicting disease and hurricanes and shit on us for the lulz, but they don't think its a big deal because when we die they move our souls into anime heavan for eternity, where your own personal desires are catred too, so if you like feet for exaple then you live the rest of your life as a freshman in a school where senior girls who secrely like you tease you with their feet. so the small amount of pain we have on earth is like somebody putting a cucumber behind a cat and scaring it, for short period of time the animal is distresssed but for most of the animal's life its happy. Thats my religion and why Im not scared of death
>U-UHMM IS PLAYING AROUND WITH YOUR PET A-ABUSE G-G-GUYS??
No wonder zoophilia is treated like murder here, Wauf is reddit incarnate.
>*snarf* *gay nerd snivel sound here* i-if you dont like zoophilia yur a redditer >:C
slit your wrists and post a webm of it pls and ty.
>I-I'M NOT FROM REDDIT!
>*proceeds to virtue signal about how all zoophiles must die*
Do you also have original thoughts in your head besides what society is feeding you?
have a nice day dog fucker
have a nice day zoophobe?
My original thoughts are that you should seriously consider adding a video of yourself to a /gif/ rekt collection 😉
again, cut longways and upload a .webm, it would be much appreaciated.
Why would anyone be afraid of some weasely little dog-rapist? kek
>tfw Spain legalized zoophilia in cases where the animal doesn't get injured enough for a vet visit
I hate this country.
I can't believe this guy is America's current president.
I have a better question:
"Trillion Sad" or "Million Sad"?
TRILLION MILLION BILLION PITY
PRAY TO CARL
PRAY TO SAVE FROM DENY
FIND NO MERCY ONLY DENY
DENY THE BABY MONKEY
ONLY PITY FOR BABY MONKEY
ONLY MILLION BILLION TRILLION PITY FOR LITTLE AWFUL BABY MONKEY
I WANT TO LIVE IN A COUNTRY WITH BABY MONKEY SO I TOO MAY DENY THE BABY MONKEY
Not only he is laughing at the poor baby monki, he's also showing his teeth to him, which in monki language is a sign of agression. He is probably very scared.
So if you smile at a monkey it is abuse because it could make the monkey feel scared.
Depends on the monkey. A chimp will probably try to rip your face out.
most animals don't have a concept of humor and it's arguably abusive to mess with humorless humans but fuck it I do both anyways
I was feeding pigeons in the garden and this one pigeon flew down and looked like it had big white sneakers on. It must have been one of the ones with feathers on it's feet but they weren't as messy as you usually see. They were pretty much perfectly sneaker shaped. I just lost it, like the guy with the clown monkey, I couldn't look at it without bursting out laughing. It was like it knew I was mocking it and it flew away without eating anything. I felt a little bad for it but holy shit it wad impossible to look at without laughing.
Animal "abuse" can't exist because they don't have souls.
And you can't "abuse" the "human rights" of an abrahamic cultist because those "people" offered their souls up for consumption by the demon yahweh or perhaps his little brother, some moon demon pretending to be him, and thus are no longer human. Your point?
For those of us that are still living things, all animals have souls.
based and religious truthpilled
either all life is souled or no life is souled
That image makes him look like he's wearing one of those animal riding costumes with the fake legs.
It's not even b8 at this point.
I think it depends. If you're one of those chucklefucks who constantly agitates their small, nervous dog to the point of trying to kill you then yes, you're an abusive sack of shit.
I thought the whole point of a cat is to wave their back legs back and forth while it lays there refusing to exert the effort to even acknowledge you
I usually trick my dog by pretending I don't have her toy
Why are you people so insufferable?
depends on your definition of “fucking around”
are you messing with them every minute of the day or just occasionally? are you throwing your cat across the room or just poking them? I think it’s fine if your pet has has a positive bond with you 99% of the time and your “fucking around” doesn’t lead to chronic symptoms of stress.
I think it depends. I like to lightly annoy my cat by batting her feet until she bats me back. I am fucking with her for my own amusement I guess, but that's pretty far from abuse.
its a doggy dog world out there, my cat needs to learn that just because i wave a piece of ham in front of his face doesnt mean its his
>doggy dog world
Thanks for telling us you're a fucking retard lmao. It's "dog EAT dog", moron.
What? That doesn't make any sense. Dogs don't eat dogs. It's a doggy dog world because it'll leave you dog-tired if you let it. Maybe read a book before you try to lecture people lol
(i will cum all over your doorknob before you come home)
DOG-EAT-DOG. Like, everyone (or the world) is either competing with you or out to get you in some manner, and you gotta watch your back.
>dog-eat-dog first appeared in print in 1918
>doggy-dog first appeared in print in 1972
Dumb hill to die on.
This term was only invented after pitbulls were. Before that, it was canis caninam non est.
Unfortunately the genetic contamination of the shitbull has only spread since then.
It's a dog eat dog eat cat eat bird eat worm world assholes
>Dumb hill to die on
says the guy arguing with an obvious troll
"obvious troll" = (You)
lmao, this guy has never heard of the phrase "doggy dog world"
It's an eggcorn you fucking retard
Holy shit board intelligence has been dropp
>what is an Eggcorn
have a nice day you absolute retard
dog do eats dogs. there's literally videos on tiktok and youtube of huskies being eaten
>Dogs do eat dogs
Prey driven dogs like borzoi may eat SMALLER dogs, as in. chihuahuas and stuff, because there's a chance they won't recognize them as the same species if not socialized early on.
If large dogs are eating each other, it's probably because of wolf, pitbull, chow chow, shar pei, etc admixture. A domesticated dog that deserves to live does not eat its fellow dogs - this is a matter of breeding. Their aggressive and predatory instincts are reduced to the point where they are incapable of that level of violence against their peers, or they are simply put down.
I absolutely believe that some sub-neanderthal chinese peasant set their chow mix out on a killing mission or just never owned a leash or bothered to train the thing, and as a result, they killed and started eating an actual domesticated animal. However, that is irrelevant. here in the west we enforce civility.
Such a dog would have been neutered at birth and slaughtered and sent to a rendering plant at its first offense.
people have bred and trained dogs to eat dogs. you know how pitbulls work? they're technically not aggressive. they pass temperament tests with flying colors. they're actually trying to kill the other dog/toddler for food. personally, i don't count those as "dogs"... dog = domesticated wolf that doesn't cause trouble with people or other large animals. if it's aggressive it's not a dog, it's a wolf, and man's natural duty is to exterminate wolves in his territory.
we are the siberian tigers of this planet. other predators other than bears are not allowed to exist unless they are subservient to us and live peacefully under our eye.
>you know how pitbulls work? they're technically not aggressive.
>if it's aggressive it's not a dog, it's a wolf, and man's natural duty is to exterminate wolves in his territory.
shut up retard
I said technically, retard.
For all practical purposes, although "ITS NOT AGGRESSION FROM THE DOGS POINT OF VIEW THEY'RE VERY FRIENDLY", killing and eating another dog is an act of aggression. Likewise I don't care if you don't feel any remorse or anger when you rape a woman. Evil is not innate. It is assigned.
he's right, you're fucking retarded and need to shut up.
Sorry is it because I believe in killing your heckin pittie
Is it because I believe that wolves don't deserve to live within 1000 miles of the nearest human but you want to fuck them
Is it because the majority of dogs need to fucking die but that offends your furfagginess?
How about you shut up. I'm moral, you worship demons.
Dogs don't eat dogs. Reasoning: Any moral person agrees that they should not. If a dog eats another dog, kill it. Kill its parents. Kill its offspring. This is called domestication, you fucking retard. Reversing it should be a crime so high that you should be held liable for everything done by every single shitty violent dog you had a hand in creating.
based, redpilled, this, 115thpbp, etc. dog gayry went way too far as soon as people started breeding "guard" dogs
>average guard dog
>ignores robbers if they know how to act around dogs
>kills wandering children
>is it because I believe in killing your heckin pittie
no, it's because you can't tell a dog from a wolf, think everything orange needs to be peeled and eaten so you munch on traffic cones all day, and have fantasies of killing things.
you're stupid, and you're dangerous. School shooter material all the way.
>nooo it's not a wolf
First off, if you want to be autistic, all dogs are literally wolves. They are the same species by every single metric. A dog is a wolf just like indian and canadian wolves are both wolves. All canis lupus subspecies.
But we're not autistic. Dog is a social convention for distinguishing wolves that can integrate into and possibly serve civil society. If a dog attacks its peers or superiors, which is far outside any legal job description of hunting and pest control, it is therefore no longer a dog, because it is literally a wolf, and can not integrate into or serve civil society.
Therefore, it must be killed as if it were a wolf wandering around the city center. Relocation is not on the table because it's not a native species of wolf outside of northern siberia, where all our pet wolves originally came from.
you still can't tell a dog from a wolf,
and you still want to kill things for no reason
get help or help will be given to you.
>you still can't tell a dog from a wolf
Biologically all dogs are wolves. Socially dog is for domesticated wolves. Dangerous dogs are not domesticated. QED.
>For no reason
Needless risk to the safety of humans and their property.
I run the animal control operation in a medium sized city and actively resist no-kill shelters. Anyone who has accused me of just hating dogs because a pitbull mix killed my nephew is right. But also, because of the three dozen other people killed by "dogs" every year.
nobody reads your walls of lies retard.
We're putting down another 6 pitbull mixes (and a wolfdog too!) on monday.
you're 12 years old and living in an asylum, you're not "putting down" anything
damn you putting down one of your dads again? maybe if your mom wouldn't have been a massive whore you'd know who you real dad is
>wtf bro you want to kill the heckin velvet hippos for no reason
>*toddler mauling sounds in the distance*
ew, it's a vegan
he says right after wanting to kill pitties lmfaoo
>things that are similar in one respect are identical in all respects
>your reaction to one thing must be the same for all similar things
>thinly veiled pro animal abuse thread (likely from a /gif/ tourist)
M O D S
I love how these threads always bring the worms out of the woodwork.
As long as you aren't stressing them out or causing any kind of unpleasantness then no. It's fine.
Just don't let them suffer is all
>nooo animals cannot feel the least bit unpleasant otherwise it is NOT FINE.
as long as the animal isn't being hurt, i don't think it's abuse.
their minds are not complex enough to care about stupid pranks.
depends on the animal. i remember a video of a gorilla taking a man's hat and putting it on, then looking dejected when the camera crew started laughing at him
So the only abuse going in is you feeling bad on the animals behalf.
no. the gorilla was ashamed.
Yes I am sure you knew exactly how the gorilla felt.
Was it you, Anon? Were you the gorilla?
that's just you anthropomorphizing.
i do believe more complex animals are capable of emotional or mental damage. just look at how macaques develop coping mechanisms like holding their heads after a psycho cambodian denies them the milk bar for weeks on end. teasing these animals is questionable in my opinion. a light teasing here and there might be ok, but not prolonged.
they don't have the brain capacity to feel shame. that is a feeling uniquely concocted by humans and our societies.
ffs stop anthopomorphizing animals.
yes, they do. shame is a kind of social fear. every social animal can feel shame, a persistent feeling of persecution and a lack of belonging, after doing something that the entire group hates.
stop being an anti-animal westcuck and desperately trying to justify some desert death cult's book of lies. everything smarter than a rat is self aware and has an inner world.
anon they don't have the brain capacity, period. your are coping so insanely hard it's starting to get embarrassing.
>stop being an anti-animal westcuck
in addition, you're also desperately projecting. just because i have a working brain and accept reality and realize the limitations of our pets doesn't mean i hate them.
>aww animows awe dummehs n u am cowping
Thanks for admitting your concession polmoron
there's nothing to concede, you had no argument other than "dey can feel like uz!!!!!!!!!!!!"
You're assuming just as much as the other anon. The fact is that we have no idea what they are or are not capable of feeling.
We have no idea the complexity of a gorillas mind, while I agree with what your saying with them not display shame it's because they don't understand the concept of right and wrong so they can't feel shame since everything they're doing is right. It's not that they are incapable of showing shame.
If you told me a snake is incapable of showing shame I'd agree mostly. They might feel something similar on a very small level but never as complex as a human.
Tldr you're assuming shit
What? Dude Gorillas are hominids. They're taxonomically extremely close to humans. They're also about as intelligent as your average toddler and live in complex societies. Social embarrassment is an evolved trait that obviously provides a function in human hominids, I see no reason why it wouldn't be present in non- human hominids.
If any creatures can feel emotions like humans, it would be the great apes. Fuck I mean those chimpanzees have war. Not just territorial squabbles, like actual ideologically driven war.
based gorilla sympathizer, ignore the autists
The best thing about 'abusing' an animal by slapping a slice of cheese on its head and laughing at it is the people who piss their pants and scream "ABOOOOSE".
morally, probably. but it's fun to mess with animals.
Whats the point of having a cat if you can't antagonize it?
How do you ethically troll a cat? Laser pointer?
You mean like pretending to offer a stray dog a bite of your food?