If you look up any museum they are displaying a "replica" of the fossils, and despite claims to the contrary, the more consistent claim is that dinosaurs are /at best/ just bad science or an invention of the mind.
>dig up big bones of larger animals from the past
>WOW DINOSAUR
>it's actually like 40 different skeletons all mish-mashed together
Now, I wasn't really considering this seriously at all, but then came across that "fossil fuels" is also basically a complete misnomer and oil comes instead from algae and bacteria.
Really I think that they got the science wrong on this bullshit and then just didn't give a fuck because it was making money.
nice thread i didn't read it lol
they're real, now fuck off brainlet
I don't know about t rex but Wauf told me picrel was 100% impossible because of square cube law. If it was real they would have to have been half underwater like hippos.
>I am a retard
yes
>Well if that's the case you can prove it to me
Still 0 proof after all these posts. This is my problem bros. If you are reading this thread, please take note of this.
>all these posts about a supposedly "scientifically valid" field and there are
0 sources
0 documents
0 means of proving that the fossils are in fact fossils from a certain time period
Seriously, it should not be hard. Ask a mathfag for a proof and they will give you a PDF and leave. You don't need "institutions of mathematics" to verify that it's real either, or specialized equipment. Obviously Paleontology isn't exactly the same but the fact that NONE of the people defending this have been able to produce any level of REASONABLE proof makes me consider these ideas in the first place.
>"science" expect us to believe that this was a real flying animal
What about this fossilized Ankylosaurus then?
It is more than just bones.
That one is not far from a croc. It's hardly a T Rex, is it?
While i agree the science on the matter is shoddy at best, saying shit like
>>it's actually like 40 different skeletons all mish-mashed together
makes you sound like a flat earther
This is the new israelite flat-earth psyops? Or you are the owner of the creationist museum?
Every culture in history has stories of ancient, gigantic reptiles.
We find shit tons of skeletons that appear to be ancient, gigantic reptiles.
I dont see the problem.
Did archaeologists weave complex theories from miniscule information? Yes, thats normal and can safely be discounted as relevant as hollywood.
Were there ancient, gigantic reptiles during the early days of human history? Going by the early accounts and matching them up perfectly with actual fossils, yes. Yes there were.
Yet 'humans' weren't supposed to exist at the same time as dinos, but I don't believe that.
True, it's all a scam. What you see is some whale skull, crocodile teeth, tiger claws, etc. Paleontology is a scam perpetuated by archeologists, aka grave robbers.
Based.
>klei
What language?
>Don't question the heliocentric model goy
>Oy vey, look at these epic dinosaurs bones, it's just like in a movie
>No you can't question the big bang theory, it's an important theory, that show how everything is a coincidence.
>You are unimportant stardust
>You evolved from chimps goys
Woolly mammoths are always being found, so something like this is not is dispute.
But these other prehistoric animals? Why are the discoveries supposedly so few and far between if they were roaming the whole earth? If bone fossilises into stone like materials, we should be finding loads?
Tell me what TF is going on...
Dinosaurs were the israelites of the animal kingdom
Except their holocaust actually happened
The problem with absolutist takes like yours, is that your ideas will never fit 100%
Paleontology is definitely Nigerian prince tier bullshit, but that doesn't meant dinosaurs are fake. It just means that weaselly retards desperate to justify the resources spent on their existing, will make up bullshit to do that.
There are tons of examples of things that they extrapolated from a single bone fragment, but there are also skeletons that were complete enough to compare to other largely complete skeletons to infer a complete one.
Sauce on complete skeletons?
You're a retard
You might not want to hear it, but the flatties are correct. It's almost impossible to wake up the goycattle.
>Memeflag
>Implying that flat Earth shit isn't well poisoning
>be me, OP
>call flat earth out as well poisoning early in the thread
>FLAT EARTH?
Lol these well poisoners are OBSESSED. (about not discussing how dinosaurs are a sham)
>Gogo-gaga CiA pSY oP mEmE flAg
90 some percent of all the bones in a museum are fake
0 literal dinosaur "bones" exist at all, retard, they transition into minerals that are very delicate and have to be replicated with plaster molds.
Yeah they aren’t even that, retard. They’re fake as in FOAM
No shit they don't display the minerals in a museum, literally every exhibit tells u this, holy fuck, you must just be a time-wasting shill
who makes these gay threads
who makes gay posts like yours lmao. imagine you are a lurker and they read your post.
>who makes these gay threads
Bro make a better fucking post you lazy retard. At least a lurker will kek at me making retarded fun posts whereas yours is just trash.
>right here, retard
Oh ok, so when I asked about when I said something previously, that was when I had actually said it, after the fact. That's nagger logic you stupid nagger.
>"where did I say that???"
>*gets shown where he said it*
>"ummm...... uhhhhhh...... well you're a nagger, ha!"
cope
Where did I say "oranges are better than apples"?
>OMG RIGHT THERE YOU SAID IT
>I SEARCHED THAT TEXT AND THERE IT IS
Lol dumb nagger. You copied my insult too. Just pathetic really.
This is a very important thread. Dinosaurs are a hoax. They were invented to give credibility to the evolution hoax pushed by freemason Charles Darwin. They needed to create a history of millions of years in order for creatures to be able to 'evolve'. The bigger question is why, why create these deceptions? My position is that it was done to hide the existence of intelligent design. I don't buy in to organised religion either btw, but we did not evolve from monkeys and there was no such thing as the big bang. This information is extremely difficult for normal people to process.
Personally I think it's the galaxy brain inversion:
Validate Darwin to ensure that people don't talk about the Earth and instead talk about the "big bang" off out in ???
pic rel is obviously a giraffe.
It's actually the skeleton of a rabbi in the "donation" pose, idiot.
he's obviously grasping a poop clump.
>challah
"Add an extra c in front because it will be free"
Ridiculous. You know the "c" isn't actually free because it ends up costing extra ink? How much have the israeli people suffered in ink costs having to print these extra characters?
Wow great post homosexual.
>dinosaurs were secretly the first Merchants and the reason that their teeth and mouths were so big was that back before money was invented all the food was free
it actually makes sense
lol
definetely something shady going on with dinosaur fossils. bummed me out when i found out that museum skeletons were replicas, and sometimes only derived form like 3 small bones. only few t-rex bones have ever been discovered if i remember correctly. also it is vey small circle of archeologists who get to do excavasion for dinasaur bones. and if you dont agree with them you get cast out. then again it would be colossal undertaking to fabricate all that and what would be the motivation.
Man, you should research the fossil wars in the beginning of paleontology. They most certainly would make shit up if it meant they got a better dino than their competitor. Iguanadon was the poster child of this. It's always been a cutthroat profession pushed by people with an ideology. Even today you have the rift between robert bakker and jack horner about whether or not certain "new" species were actually just juveniles of known species. No one knows anything but I'm gonna side with jack horner, aka the one who doesn't name dinosaurs after harry potter.
Dinosaurs have been described by every ancient culture, you can find their bones yourself ask Mark Armittage he found several triceratops and determined they were only a few thousands years old, not tens of millions
I have always suspected that surface and cave fossils used to be much more plentiful but were found, excavated, played with/ground to magic powder and lost by primitive man who based the worldwide concept of “dragons” on these finds.
Hell, lots and lots of important fossils almost certainly were lost in the Victorian dinosaur boom when they were excavating by blasting whole fossil sites to gravel with explosives.
Why do you people refuse to do even a cursory bit of research before making a retarded schizo thread?
They don't find the bones in a big random pile like a new lego set, you fucking moron.
In most cases, the literally find the bones in the same orientation they were in the living animal.
Also, flora has always dwarfed fauna in total biomass so no fucking shit "fossil fuels" are largely from flora.
Did you really think that was a secret?
KYS retard.
YOU are the well poisoner for associating political dissidents with retardation like dinosaur-denial.
What are you talking about? Finding dinosaurs like that are very rare. You have to think they've had millions of years to settle, move around with the plates, have rockslides or floods, any number of contributing factors. They might not be in a pile like your strawman but they're hardly ever articulated. Life isn't like the beginning of jurassic park.
>Finding dinosaurs like that are very rare
no, not really. largely complete skeletons are more rare than, say, 1 random dino bone, sure, but there are tons of largely complete diono skeletons.
>When did I say anything about "how they find the bones"?
right here, retard
>"it's actually like 40 different skeletons all mish-mashed together"
That implies they aren't arranged properly when found.
No, not really.
Like I said, we have found tons of largely complete skeletons that were generally oriented as they were in life.
The fact that fragmented skeletons ALSO exist in no way shape or from nullifies the previous fact.
Cope.
>largely complete
>250/380
>this is the best example
>this is the best example
It isn't though u fucking retard, we have found many skeletons far more complete than Sue
If you say so, dude.
Thank you for sourcing my own dunk on you.
In what way does that dunk on me? Did you miss the exceedingly rare to find a dino missing only 15% of its bones? What about the others? Fact remains every fucking fossil skeleton you see is plaster or composed of bones of several individuals. You're talking about finding articulated skeletons in the rock as if that's the way it always happens but it doesn't. Not even fucking close.
>exceedingly rare
compared to what? we've still found hundreds lmao.
>Fact remains every fucking fossil skeleton you see is plaster
Yea no fucking shit, bones don't last 65 million years. The calcium is replaced with other minerals.
>You're talking about finding articulated skeletons in the rock as if that's the way it always happens but it doesn't
Never said "always" but its happened hundreds of times lmaoooo
Just shut up, you fucking retard. You're full of shit and lying. Thanks for skipping the part where they're made from several individuals. You might get a head in one area, a leg in another, some teeth somewhere else and you put em together to get a dinosaur. Prove to me how fucking common it is. I've sourced a few sources, come up with your fucking own about how many articulated skeletons we find. I'll be waiting. Until then, fuck yourself.
From this, are we meant to extrapolate that there were fuck all dinos noncing about, and that they all had missing bones?
No, just that fossilization is rare and there's a lot of ground we haven't looked under yet.
>also you are not allowed to perform any tests or checks on the 250 bones without us doing them and we are the only ones allowed to see the tests and checks being done
>you can see the paperwork which says we are legit though
>implying Sue is the only dinosaur ever found
>implying 1 org controls all fossils
Of all the things to engage in utterly 0 faith debate in, you choose dinosaurs LMAO
You could simply post sources that disprove my claims. Should be easy, since it's a "rigorous" scientific field or whatever. I never have this problem with mathfags.
>how it goes in math
"Hey mathfags, I think this is the case"
>actually it's not, source is here
"Oh, okay, thanks."
>how it goes in Palentology
"Hey paleofags, why does this all seem fake?"
>you believe in flat earth too huh?
"What? Dude answer the question"
>yeah you don't think organizations are valid?
>I'm not talking about this
LOL
nagger, you literally got shown a nearly complete dino skeleton that was in the same orientation it was in life and you proceeded to cope and seethe lmaoooooooo
Where can you go from there?
Tell me about your theory of the secret society that buries minerals in the shape of bones oriented like fake animals.
Where is your proof of this secret society that buries these bones?
>you literally got shown a nearly complete dino skeleton that was in the same orientation it was in life******
*according to a replica
**that only a few people from certain institutions are allowed to "verify"
***and that have no sources outside of the "verification" of the institution
So you are saying I must trust the institution as opposed to getting facts myself. Lol.
When did I say anything about "how they find the bones"?
If it's made up then all of it is made up, "finding the bones" would be just another story.
Source?
>then again it would be colossal undertaking to fabricate all that
Not really. How would you disprove that they're replicas? Smash them on the ground and risk that it's real? Nope.
they are replicas meaning they are plaster or whatever casts from real bones and real bones are kept away from public. again only small circle gets to excavate and inspect them later.
WHO gets to inspect the bones?
>the community you know so well
not a small circle. but paleontology is fucking hard. imagine that you need to be a doctor and you will be paid with a scorching day in the sun excavating rare bones without margin of error.
>just trust us goy
>give us money to keep the industry alive
QUI controlle les fossiles?
Goyim's favorite thing
>israeli controlled institution prints "certified" pieces of paper for goys to discuss
>literally happy goys forever
Sorry haha, I'm just not gonna believe in dinosaurs.
they display a casting made from the fossils because if they display the real bones then Chinese tourists will sneak in with a cheese grater and shave off hunks of dinosaur bone to make magic penis widening pills and breast expansion poultices.
cant have anything nice
This is true but also bones are very heavy. There's no way they could be displayed as a complete skeleton with those tiny metal connectors.
Wait, you mean those metal things are not part of the skeleton??
The bones would have also been too heavy to withstand their own weight when the dinosaur was alive. If a t-rex were to just merely stand there, it's fucking legs would break under its own weight.
You don't know that. It depends on the musculature. Muscles are pretty strong. Look at our thighs. Heaviest bone in the body, moving constantly for 70 years. It's cause our ass muscles are so big.
The bones are heavy now because they’ve been mineralized in the fossilization process and are now big lumps of stone, but when they were alive they would have been similar to a giant ostrich.
T-rex is ostensibly pushing the limits of bipedal body structure but according to ~~*computer modeling*~~ he could have walked at a moderate pace of maybe 30 mph, but wouldn’t have been able to run after reaching adult size.
In 10 years they’ll probably have a new theory about how the Tyrannosaurus was the first Black man and thus we wuz Raxes an sheit
They aren't even just bones which would be dense. They are mineralized. Meaning made of stone lol.
Well yeah. In that respect I just meant dinosaur bones in layman's terms. I know how fossilization works and that they are basically big rocks in the shape of bones. But that's not always the case either cause now you have the chinese saying they found fossilized soft tissue. As a rule, I don't believe any dinosaur that comes from china but if that's true, it changes everything.
>dinos are fake
Duhh how many Juarassic park films are there? if they were not real there would be no films
a lot of the bones are found encased in stone, it's not like they find a fucking pile of them and think they belong to the same animal you fucking lunatic
They find bones, bone fragments and pieces of bones from lots of different dinosaurs and reconstruct them based on similarities to other fossils, biomechanical extrapolations, and personal prejudices of the investigator.
many of the famous dinosaurs have “changed” over the past 10, 20, 30 years as new evidence comes to light and new theories are refined.
For example, they recently determined that spinosaurus had tiny little cuck legs and probably couldn’t even climb out of the water, he went from a trex spine snapping giant who was phone nagger to a little bitch who sat in a gay little pond eating little fish like a sad lanky homo.
Wauf has lots of dinosaur threads in between the “what is this can I fuck it?” generals
Look up Sue the t-rex and you'll see how wrong your theory is
That is all
1. Sue was still missing bones
2. They used bones from other dinosaurs to complete it
3. The head you see here isn't real, the real head is upstairs
t. someone who's been to the field museum
Aww shit, forgot pic
Bet you think the Earth is flat too.
>cant argue the fact that dinosaur skeletons are fake
>i BeT YoU ThInK EaRtH iS fLaT
Why are dinofags like this?
No, I think that is used as a means to "poison the well" or basically tag discussions as "forbidden" to normalfags.
>what do you mean anon
Well, whenever you see a thread like this one or something that questions the validity of institutions, not necessarily all of the process but just the institutions, museums, universities, government agencies, etc., then you tend to have someone come around and say "yes that's true and ALSO FLAT EARTH!"
>ok so what
Meaning that most people coming across the conversation will simply disregard it because they have been taught to disregard topics associated with such things.
So personally I think it's fucking dumb.
Well if that's the case you can prove it to me.
>Well if that's the case you can prove it to me
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/tripideas/tyrannosaurus-rex-sue-s-life-sized-replica-will-be-part-of-dinosaur-themed-campaign-in-topeka-in-2022/ar-AARgQJ1
>this replica will prove OP wrong
????????
try harder fag
https://www.grunge.com/245975/the-tragic-real-life-story-of-sue-the-t-rex/
>CONFISCATED BY THE FBI
Lmao wow so real
It's the newer version of "you probably believe the moon landing is fake, too."
Bet you think we went to the moon
Yeah that's another one. You can't question the validity of NASA without someone coming around to say
>THE REPTILIAN FLAT MOON AM I RIGHT MY FELLOW SCHIZOPHRENICS
in an attempt to ruin the conversation.
>but why do you think that
I think that people have an interest in protecting institutions over ideas.
... so I was right and you do think Earth is flat?
You suck at reading.
Now you’re using ellipses for a pause effect that doesn’t work over text. Instead you look like a fucking clown as well as an idiot.
wewuz eclipses and sheit
What a fucking moron you are. The earth is clearly a Dyson Sphere.
What’s it like to go into a thread full of people being dumb on purpose and actually be the biggest retard? Is there a little voice in your head telling you to have a nice day?
and your ancestor is a ambitious fish?