Large dogs are a threat to everyone in their vicinity, especially in areas where concealed carry is regulated or banned. Furthermore, city slickers and suburbanites have no reason to own a dog (e.g. for herding sheep) and will instead keep it confined within their home or apartment all day, which is animal cruelty.
Black people are naturally occurring human beings and pitbulls are dogs we forcibly inbred to make more violent. Lots of forced incest and rape racks in their history.
The closest thing to a human race dogs have is a landrace breed, like the free ranging shepherding dogs, jindos, canaan dogs, japanese spitzes, and russian sled dogs (laika, husky, chukotka dog, etc) since they pretty much bred at random and the only selective pressure was humans giving the ones they liked food and killing the ones that attacked the wrong things for the wrong reasons.
Honestly the biggest problem isn't the large dogs but the amount of fucking retards with any size dogs that won't use leashes at all OR will use a shirty wire leash that they keep at full distance while on their phone holding it with 2 fingers.
The amount of times an off leash dog has charged me and my dogs or ripped the leash from the owners hands is infuriating. People live in these little townhouse suburbs and apartments and think their front yard with 2 inches of grass is the same thing as a fenced in property. I've busted my knees open three times having to tackle somebody's dog to the ground or shielding my dog or theirs to prevent a confrontation. People are just absolute shit pet owners. If someone with a dog is within eyesight you just have to be on full guard and never trust them to use common sense
I fucking wish my shithole of a town would ban anything resembling pitbulls. Recently the old guy who lived next to me died. Some cop and his wife bought the house. They brought two massive pitbulls with them, and the other day I saw the wife walking down the street with one of them. No leash, not even a collar. I know it's only a matter of time before that thing degloves one the kids that ride their bikes through this neighborhood. The funny part is that my town has a leash law, but I doubt the cops would give a shit considering my neighbor is one of their own.
>no leash no collar
So call animal control on the dog, it's obviously a stray...
>cop with shitty dogs
Yep. We had a cop across the street with two large dogs (not pibbles) that just bark like fucking crazy day and night. You can even hear the barking when they put the dogs inside their house.
What do you want to bet that if you file a complaint, not only does the city take zero action against the cop, but you get your name on some kind of shitlist for 'enhanced' enforcement of codes and ordinances.
Unironically poison it if you care about any of the children in the neighborhood. If not, their parents will do it if theyhave any sense
I honestly hate the "large dog" reference, we know what breeds cause deaths and injuries, and we have BSL for that.
Like, there has never been Great Pyrenees deaths lol.
Just ban pitbulls out-right, they are a blood sport breed, bred to be not a pet as much as possible, and require some sort of license to own Huskies, Doberman, etc.
Doberman nah, they're safer than labs. Huskies nah, they're not very dangerous either, as long as they're not those giant yellow eyed "huskies". Those are dogs with fatality rates so low and fatality causes so obviously abhorrent to common sense they're a total non issue. German shepherds though? Definitely.
I always thought cities and towns should be segregated into dog-owning and non-dog owning, so there are places for people to go strictly that are not dog friendly, and places that will welcome dog lovers/know to expect them
just segregate the nodogs. give them their own schools, businesses, and water fountains. their immune systems are weaker after all. however, cat owners are allowed in the nice, i mean, dog side of town if they can keep their cat out of other peoples property.
you're fucking stupid m8. The true large breeds are gentle giants.
You should get a hippo for your kid. They’re gentle giants. A nanny mammal, even
Pitbulls should be banned just for being ugly alone.
Look at this creature. A being of pure hatred and malevolence bred for no other purpose. We instinctively fear and hate such creatures and those who don't are defective and shouldn't spread their defective genes.
If there's an animal equivalent to LOTR orcs it's this. It's a corrupted creature that exists only to commit violence, and anyone from any culture on the planet can take one look at it and tell you it's evil.
Severely underrated post.
>Large dogs are a threat to everyone in their vicinity,
Lol even southern whites don't like pitbulls. I guess they lost their use for them when the AR15 was invented.
We lost our use for them when the 1911 was invented. They've been moron dogs for over 100 years.
Hard to read with that 50% transparency bullshit.
>Kentucky and Louisiana are far right and pro gun
So it's true that in America, dogs and guns have nothing to do with each other and pro-ptibull = liberal.
That's why libertarians > conservatives
the irony of this post after a literal century of cucking
dogs are not and will never be a human right
why ban them when we can just kill them
Better question is why a serb (nonwhite, third world) is trying to associate himself with american neonazi groups and a dog known for being a favorite of blacks and southern “whites” that are all 1/4 black… at the same time?
He must be an ameriboo but he doesn’t know what america or whites are actually like because he will never be either.
commies and liberals are the major opponents of BSL in the US. conservative whites have historically hated dogs.
>public housing authority
this is like taking your rights if you’re caught with crack cocaine but not regular cocaine. it only affects a certain demographic. working as the founding fathers intended.
At this point I think even pitbulls are probably better pets than a stupid cat
ITT angry cat owner complaining because poor wittwe mittens got scuffed by a husky ;_;
Banning pitbull ownership is like banning slave ownership
Its nice you think bubba the boss bro protects your plantation but having his sort in society causes more trouble than its worth. Hire a fellow citizen and pay them a wage instead of playing beastmaster with unthinking slave animals.
Your pic sounds familiar
Oh wait it describes your incessant pitbull shilling
A dumb animal is not courageous. Its aggressive. Animals do not have courage. They have aggression, fear, and predatory instincts. Courage is consciously overcoming fear. Without consciousness you can not have courage. These dumb animals lack consciousness. They are more aggressive than fearful and must be strictly conditioned to keep them under control.
>as outlined in my other propaganda thread
The one where big cat comparison anon BTFO you?
IF I SEE A PITBULL OFF LEASH
I AM SHOOTING IT
AND WALKING AWAY
GOD BLESS AMERICA
AND FUCK THE SAVAGES THAT THINK A DOG BELONGS OFF ITS CHAIN
>i hate the government i hate the government i hate the government
>is that...IS THAT A DOG BREED I DONT LIKE??????? AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HELP ME GOVERNMENT PLEASE BAN IT BAN IT BAN IT I DON'T LIKE IT PLEASE IM SCARED
why are you like this?
>actual rightoids itt: is that a pitbull? *draws pistol* call your dog back buddy, one step forward and i might “fear for my life”
the second amendment said keep and bear arms, not keep and arm bears.
you aren't pulling a gun on any dog, nogunz
yeah i am. i carry a glock 26 IWB every single day. and i get it out faster (immediately) for dogs than i ever have a crack addled hobo. reason being a human life is valuable and a pitbull is a leech that can be replaced with a better animal for $50.
a specific breed is not arms, you can bring the 2A into it when people ban protection dog training and using guard dogs. banning a specific breed means nothing, and these breed bans often exclude the breeds that make the best weapons (malinois, schnauzer) while only covering the loose cannons that "don't need trained" (are universally aggressive and uncontrollable). dogs are not weapons, they are the materials you make weapons from. if you ban specific dog breeds its not like banning guns... that's like banning firearms manufacturers from making their guns out of a specific kind of plastic because of a rash of exploding handgun accidents, while not banning ALL plastics because some of them are demonstrably stronger and make for better guns.
waaah waaaah waaah that's all i hear. save me government help me, but i also hate you too! pathetic spineless lot you are
Repost this on /int/, link it so I can see your flag. If you're not american I'm going to laugh my ass off.
Keep and bear arms != keep and arm bears. I don't give a fuck about your dog, if it's not trained to be a weapon it's not a weapon, and if it's a shitty breed it's like saying you can't sell guns made out of paper machet. The only thing the government could save here is my wallet from spending $1 to replace a spent round of liberty civil defense.
>serb was posting hot and then asconded after this post
figures, he's probably going around discords looking for an american to do this for him
Kek we've had laws for this since the invention of guns. Barrels have to be proof tested to prove they won't explode on people.
If dogs were shit out on assembly lines we could proof test pitbulls but I think banning them is like banning the use of shitty steel that would almost never make a sturdy barrel.
I agree fully
Bred to kill and fight other dogs... humans went down this path, the dogs are relatively blameless. Heartbreaking, tragic misstep of circumstance to expect a beast to account for (otherwise) conscious human behavior. The offending humans are deserving of execution in my opinion
These are three of the most gun friendly states in the US. They banned all these aggressive dogs because they got sick of wasting ammo. And because most of them are basically pitbulls for all purposes, or something pitbull owners claim to own to skirt BSL (based safety laws).
>let's look at the men that are either dangerous or deviant and uncooperative
>high facial masculinity
>high facial asymmetry
>anomalous morphology (underbites, overbites, revolting proportions, ears sticking way out, etc)
>difficulty making eye contact
>low intelligence indicated by low socioeconomic status
>more likely to be very short or very tall
hmmm i don't think "men are bad" is any more of a valid statement than "women are too irrational to be allowed to lead or vote". you can separate the wheat and the chaff with a quick look over. in fact, i believe our species has instincts that do this specifically.
just like you can gauge an orangutan by their flange or a lion by their mane
There's another population of animals that kill way more than shitbulls and they are no considered animals at all.
I'm center-left though. Pits get the rope. 😉
>hey can't be that big/heavy.
Bro, you just woke up from a 50 year coma, Pits have been SLAMMED™
He's a serb all he knows are the prissy imported purebreds and doesn't want to believe that the US has changed the direction of one of its own dog breeds. It's like when americans think huskies are all super friendly teddybears like picrel but in canada and alaska they're pulling sleds with savage, antisocial 100lb wolf hybrids and russians use borderline feral snow dingoes that get fed krokodil.
Ban yourself, gay
What if I like to run and hike with my dog
Move to the country
i accept your concession. continue seething like the rightoid monkey you are. go ahead and empty your soijak folder here if it helps with the tears
>nooo where's the heckin logic and reasonerino you can't just have common sense
Not my fault you're too retarded to argue like a person instead of an autist, autist.
you already did a no true scotsman by saying "uhm asskcually rightoids aren't REAL right wingers!" so your argument was invalid to begin with
Join the 42 morongay.
actually chud it’s 50 now
Pic rel is counted as a large breed.
Right wing americans have always had finer standards than "rightoids" anon.
>right wing god fearing white man: We should ban assault rifles but not hunting rifles.
>rightoid: RECREATIONAL GRENADE LAUNCHER DURRRR
>right wing: golden retrievers should be bred more, exterminate rottweilers.
>rightoid: BUT IVE BEEN A FELON SINCE JAN 6TH AND ONLY WEIGH 120LB HOW WILL I DEFEND MY HOME?
>claims i posted a strawman
>posts more retarded strawmen
not only are rightoids hypocrites, they can't read either nor address arguments
That's not a strawman, it's the sad truth. Actual right wing men have always been for regulation.
Rightoids are anti-government libertardians.
You created two fictional characters, pitched them against each other and called it an argument.
Someone who works at mcdonalds is better than a commie that thinks "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need". Needs are genuinely irrelevant. If you need something you can also earn it. If you want something you can also earn it. Contribute to society.
For example, you have to pay for running water. You have to pay just to exist in the country. Get a job.
Also, OP is a total retard who has never had a dog and doesn't understand how animals minds work. He projects his immature wildman fantasies onto them and imagines dogs fantasizing about RETVRNING TO TRVDVSHUN.
I don't pay for running water nor do I pay for any other living expenses. Where is your "earn" now?
>he doesn't pay for running water
So someone else is. You're government property so what you want or have earned really is irrelevant, what matters is what your owner wants for you.
Kek, I thought kids weren't allowed to post on this website.
Pits can weigh up to 130 pounds. Neither breed is officially recognized (thank God) therefore they have no standards. Both are AmStaff mixes.
Pit Bull = Bull-Type Terrier
Bull-Type Terriers: American Bully American Pit Bull Terrier
American Staffordshire Terrier Boston Terrier Bull and terrier [extinct]
Bull Terrier Miniature Bull Terrier. Staffordshire Bull Terrier
ITT a serb tries to appeal to americans not knowing that pitbulls are principally an african american guard dog and whites prefer the more intelligent, self preserving shepherd breeds. You are not a white american, snapshot, neither nor, stop trying to appeal to us. We hate pitbulls. They are useless dogs, cowardly protectors, too dumb to be servants, only good for attacking. The only whites who ever appreciated them were slave owners that used them to rub down escapees.
yes all dogs are equally dangerous just like japan and the congo have the same murder rate lmao
genetics dont real. dogs bred for fighting and guarding do not make up the majority of the bites at all. its how you raise dem. dey din du ruffin.
Dogs were bred to sit on their ass AND THEN go do stuff WITH THEIR OWNER, not roam around and get ran over/eaten like a cat. Go look at an alaskan sled dog farm.
Newsflash: all animals get eaten
First they will take your dogs, then your guns, then your house wont be "yours" and then you lose all of your freedom
We will take dogs from blacks, mostly. idk if you noticed but dog bans focus on what’s popular with blacks/italian mobs (now defunct), as do gun and knife bans
taking the means of violence away from filthy peasants is a time honored european tradition and only violent peasants that dream about killing the king have an issue with it. then they eventually fuck everyone else over by being so belligerent the nation has to go full britain.
I dont know if you notice but there's 3 nigs in every corner. If you agree with the government telling what dog you can and cannot own, soon you will lose other ways to protect yourself and your house. Fuck, soon your house wont be yours. But probably you will be happy when a Black breaks into hour house, kill your parents and you will need to accept this.
I protect my house with a gun. Not a dumb fucking animal. Dogs are for third world tier idiots that can’t legally own weapons or afford security systems, you know, like serbs. And felons. Traditionally when we had them, they were beaten and chained like objects, not pets, because they were born and bred to attack people.
America has always hated dangerous dogs and most dog laws from the east coast concern our right to execute them in public.
>I protect my house with a gun
Soon you wont be able to own guns and this will be your fault
>Ban a shitty inbred mutt
>Somehow this has to do with guns and the right to bear arms
If you want to classify attack dogs as "arms", then we now admit that pitbulls are not pets, and never will be. They are weapons and treated as such. A pitbull has no rights. It is hammered into working correctly with as much violence as is needed and its "feelings" are not acknowledged because a weapon does not have feelings and a weapon is not your friend. It exists to kill. A pitbull is not left in the care of any minor. A pitbull is a tool. And if it misfires, it is taken to a gunsmith to be hammered into shape or simply destroyed, and its owned is charged with negligence or manslaughter.
My state became an open carry state IIRC last year.
Your house already isn't yours you stupid moron
autistic moron, no one said anything about pitbulls.
The average pitbull is only around 45lbs/20kg. Part of that is used to skate around housing restrictions on dogs over a certain weight. If someone is going to consider that “large”, you also end up banning several dog breeds actually suited for citylife.
wojackgays deserve death
1: Most large dog breeds, despite numbering in the millions, kill less than one person per year. Fighting dogs, german shepherds, and rottweilers are the only genuinely dangerous ones because of their high energy level and a history of breeding specifically to attack people.
"Need" mattering is distinctly marxist and is part of a communist slogan "to each according to his need". "NEED" does not factor into capitalist culture. You get what you have EARNED. If you want to talk NEED, you do not NEED to be posting here. You NEED to be working more hours and contributing to the success of the motherland.
Dogs were bred to stay close to humans and move around very little, so you do not need a large amount of space for a dog to roam free. Having such space normally results in an untrained, semi-feral dog. Dogs are happiest when they stay at home and explore with a human by their side to keep them safe.
i'm sorry, anon
looks like you haven't EARNED enough credits for today's clean air tube
nice knowing you, anon
I have because I’m not a useless gay. Natural selection bitches!
>Fighting dogs, german shepherds, and rottweilers
Are you even trying?
Fighting dogs, german shepherds, and rottweilers are the only genuinely dangerous ones because of their high energy level and a history of breeding specifically to attack people.
You NEED to be 18 to post here
>dogs do not require a lot of space to roam free
t. Never takes his lazy ass outside to walk the dog
Instead they should be replaced by safe animals, like crocodiles and wolverines