Cities and arguably suburbs should ban large dogs

Large dogs are a threat to everyone in their vicinity, especially in areas where concealed carry is regulated or banned. Furthermore, city slickers and suburbanites have no reason to own a dog (e.g. for herding sheep) and will instead keep it confined within their home or apartment all day, which is animal cruelty.

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Black people are naturally occurring human beings and pitbulls are dogs we forcibly inbred to make more violent. Lots of forced incest and rape racks in their history.

      The closest thing to a human race dogs have is a landrace breed, like the free ranging shepherding dogs, jindos, canaan dogs, japanese spitzes, and russian sled dogs (laika, husky, chukotka dog, etc) since they pretty much bred at random and the only selective pressure was humans giving the ones they liked food and killing the ones that attacked the wrong things for the wrong reasons.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly the biggest problem isn't the large dogs but the amount of fucking retards with any size dogs that won't use leashes at all OR will use a shirty wire leash that they keep at full distance while on their phone holding it with 2 fingers.

    The amount of times an off leash dog has charged me and my dogs or ripped the leash from the owners hands is infuriating. People live in these little townhouse suburbs and apartments and think their front yard with 2 inches of grass is the same thing as a fenced in property. I've busted my knees open three times having to tackle somebody's dog to the ground or shielding my dog or theirs to prevent a confrontation. People are just absolute shit pet owners. If someone with a dog is within eyesight you just have to be on full guard and never trust them to use common sense

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I fucking wish my shithole of a town would ban anything resembling pitbulls. Recently the old guy who lived next to me died. Some cop and his wife bought the house. They brought two massive pitbulls with them, and the other day I saw the wife walking down the street with one of them. No leash, not even a collar. I know it's only a matter of time before that thing degloves one the kids that ride their bikes through this neighborhood. The funny part is that my town has a leash law, but I doubt the cops would give a shit considering my neighbor is one of their own.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >no leash no collar
      So call animal control on the dog, it's obviously a stray...

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >cop with shitty dogs
      Yep. We had a cop across the street with two large dogs (not pibbles) that just bark like fucking crazy day and night. You can even hear the barking when they put the dogs inside their house.

      What do you want to bet that if you file a complaint, not only does the city take zero action against the cop, but you get your name on some kind of shitlist for 'enhanced' enforcement of codes and ordinances.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Unironically poison it if you care about any of the children in the neighborhood. If not, their parents will do it if theyhave any sense

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I honestly hate the "large dog" reference, we know what breeds cause deaths and injuries, and we have BSL for that.

    Like, there has never been Great Pyrenees deaths lol.

    Just ban pitbulls out-right, they are a blood sport breed, bred to be not a pet as much as possible, and require some sort of license to own Huskies, Doberman, etc.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Doberman nah, they're safer than labs. Huskies nah, they're not very dangerous either, as long as they're not those giant yellow eyed "huskies". Those are dogs with fatality rates so low and fatality causes so obviously abhorrent to common sense they're a total non issue. German shepherds though? Definitely.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I always thought cities and towns should be segregated into dog-owning and non-dog owning, so there are places for people to go strictly that are not dog friendly, and places that will welcome dog lovers/know to expect them

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      just segregate the nodogs. give them their own schools, businesses, and water fountains. their immune systems are weaker after all. however, cat owners are allowed in the nice, i mean, dog side of town if they can keep their cat out of other peoples property.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >shitbull
    >large dogs
    you're fucking stupid m8. The true large breeds are gentle giants.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You should get a hippo for your kid. They’re gentle giants. A nanny mammal, even

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pitbulls should be banned just for being ugly alone.
    Look at this creature. A being of pure hatred and malevolence bred for no other purpose. We instinctively fear and hate such creatures and those who don't are defective and shouldn't spread their defective genes.
    If there's an animal equivalent to LOTR orcs it's this. It's a corrupted creature that exists only to commit violence, and anyone from any culture on the planet can take one look at it and tell you it's evil.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Severely underrated post.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      he's smiling!

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Large dogs are a threat to everyone in their vicinity,
    hehehehe pibul

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lol even southern whites don't like pitbulls. I guess they lost their use for them when the AR15 was invented.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        We lost our use for them when the 1911 was invented. They've been moron dogs for over 100 years.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/orwKvG3.png

      [...]

      Hard to read with that 50% transparency bullshit.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    >Kentucky and Louisiana are far right and pro gun
    So it's true that in America, dogs and guns have nothing to do with each other and pro-ptibull = liberal.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's why libertarians > conservatives

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        lmao

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the irony of this post after a literal century of cucking

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    dogs are not and will never be a human right

    why ban them when we can just kill them

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Better question is why a serb (nonwhite, third world) is trying to associate himself with american neonazi groups and a dog known for being a favorite of blacks and southern “whites” that are all 1/4 black… at the same time?

      He must be an ameriboo but he doesn’t know what america or whites are actually like because he will never be either.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    commies and liberals are the major opponents of BSL in the US. conservative whites have historically hated dogs.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >public housing authority
    this is like taking your rights if you’re caught with crack cocaine but not regular cocaine. it only affects a certain demographic. working as the founding fathers intended.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    At this point I think even pitbulls are probably better pets than a stupid cat

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ITT angry cat owner complaining because poor wittwe mittens got scuffed by a husky ;_;

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Banning pitbull ownership is like banning slave ownership

    Its nice you think bubba the boss bro protects your plantation but having his sort in society causes more trouble than its worth. Hire a fellow citizen and pay them a wage instead of playing beastmaster with unthinking slave animals.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Your pic sounds familiar

    Oh wait it describes your incessant pitbull shilling

    [...]

    A dumb animal is not courageous. Its aggressive. Animals do not have courage. They have aggression, fear, and predatory instincts. Courage is consciously overcoming fear. Without consciousness you can not have courage. These dumb animals lack consciousness. They are more aggressive than fearful and must be strictly conditioned to keep them under control.

    >as outlined in my other propaganda thread
    The one where big cat comparison anon BTFO you?

    DONT CARE
    IF I SEE A PITBULL OFF LEASH
    I AM SHOOTING IT
    AND WALKING AWAY

    GOD BLESS AMERICA
    AND FUCK THE SAVAGES THAT THINK A DOG BELONGS OFF ITS CHAIN

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    rightoids:
    >i hate the government i hate the government i hate the government

    also rightoids:
    >is that...IS THAT A DOG BREED I DONT LIKE??????? AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HELP ME GOVERNMENT PLEASE BAN IT BAN IT BAN IT I DON'T LIKE IT PLEASE IM SCARED

    why are you like this?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >actual rightoids itt: is that a pitbull? *draws pistol* call your dog back buddy, one step forward and i might “fear for my life”
      the second amendment said keep and bear arms, not keep and arm bears.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you aren't pulling a gun on any dog, nogunz

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          yeah i am. i carry a glock 26 IWB every single day. and i get it out faster (immediately) for dogs than i ever have a crack addled hobo. reason being a human life is valuable and a pitbull is a leech that can be replaced with a better animal for $50.

          a specific breed is not arms, you can bring the 2A into it when people ban protection dog training and using guard dogs. banning a specific breed means nothing, and these breed bans often exclude the breeds that make the best weapons (malinois, schnauzer) while only covering the loose cannons that "don't need trained" (are universally aggressive and uncontrollable). dogs are not weapons, they are the materials you make weapons from. if you ban specific dog breeds its not like banning guns... that's like banning firearms manufacturers from making their guns out of a specific kind of plastic because of a rash of exploding handgun accidents, while not banning ALL plastics because some of them are demonstrably stronger and make for better guns.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            waaah waaaah waaah that's all i hear. save me government help me, but i also hate you too! pathetic spineless lot you are

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Repost this on /int/, link it so I can see your flag. If you're not american I'm going to laugh my ass off.

              Keep and bear arms != keep and arm bears. I don't give a fuck about your dog, if it's not trained to be a weapon it's not a weapon, and if it's a shitty breed it's like saying you can't sell guns made out of paper machet. The only thing the government could save here is my wallet from spending $1 to replace a spent round of liberty civil defense.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >serb was posting hot and then asconded after this post
                figures, he's probably going around discords looking for an american to do this for him

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Kek we've had laws for this since the invention of guns. Barrels have to be proof tested to prove they won't explode on people.

            If dogs were shit out on assembly lines we could proof test pitbulls but I think banning them is like banning the use of shitty steel that would almost never make a sturdy barrel.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I agree fully

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Bred to kill and fight other dogs... humans went down this path, the dogs are relatively blameless. Heartbreaking, tragic misstep of circumstance to expect a beast to account for (otherwise) conscious human behavior. The offending humans are deserving of execution in my opinion

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    [...]

    These are three of the most gun friendly states in the US. They banned all these aggressive dogs because they got sick of wasting ammo. And because most of them are basically pitbulls for all purposes, or something pitbull owners claim to own to skirt BSL (based safety laws).

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >let's look at the men that are either dangerous or deviant and uncooperative
    >darker skin
    >high facial masculinity
    >high facial asymmetry
    >anomalous morphology (underbites, overbites, revolting proportions, ears sticking way out, etc)
    >difficulty making eye contact
    >low intelligence indicated by low socioeconomic status
    >more likely to be very short or very tall
    hmmm i don't think "men are bad" is any more of a valid statement than "women are too irrational to be allowed to lead or vote". you can separate the wheat and the chaff with a quick look over. in fact, i believe our species has instincts that do this specifically.

    just like you can gauge an orangutan by their flange or a lion by their mane

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There's another population of animals that kill way more than shitbulls and they are no considered animals at all.

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I'm center-left though. Pits get the rope. 😉

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >hey can't be that big/heavy.
    Bro, you just woke up from a 50 year coma, Pits have been SLAMMED™

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He's a serb all he knows are the prissy imported purebreds and doesn't want to believe that the US has changed the direction of one of its own dog breeds. It's like when americans think huskies are all super friendly teddybears like picrel but in canada and alaska they're pulling sleds with savage, antisocial 100lb wolf hybrids and russians use borderline feral snow dingoes that get fed krokodil.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ban yourself, gay

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What if I like to run and hike with my dog

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Move to the country

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >no response
    i accept your concession. continue seething like the rightoid monkey you are. go ahead and empty your soijak folder here if it helps with the tears

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >nooo where's the heckin logic and reasonerino you can't just have common sense
      Not my fault you're too retarded to argue like a person instead of an autist, autist.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        you already did a no true scotsman by saying "uhm asskcually rightoids aren't REAL right wingers!" so your argument was invalid to begin with

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Join the 42 morongay.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        actually chud it’s 50 now

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Pic rel is counted as a large breed.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Strawman
    Right wing americans have always had finer standards than "rightoids" anon.
    >right wing god fearing white man: We should ban assault rifles but not hunting rifles.
    >rightoid: RECREATIONAL GRENADE LAUNCHER DURRRR
    >right wing: golden retrievers should be bred more, exterminate rottweilers.
    >rightoid: BUT IVE BEEN A FELON SINCE JAN 6TH AND ONLY WEIGH 120LB HOW WILL I DEFEND MY HOME?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >claims i posted a strawman
      >posts more retarded strawmen
      not only are rightoids hypocrites, they can't read either nor address arguments

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That's not a strawman, it's the sad truth. Actual right wing men have always been for regulation.

        Rightoids are anti-government libertardians.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You created two fictional characters, pitched them against each other and called it an argument.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Someone who works at mcdonalds is better than a commie that thinks "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need". Needs are genuinely irrelevant. If you need something you can also earn it. If you want something you can also earn it. Contribute to society.

    For example, you have to pay for running water. You have to pay just to exist in the country. Get a job.

    Also, OP is a total retard who has never had a dog and doesn't understand how animals minds work. He projects his immature wildman fantasies onto them and imagines dogs fantasizing about RETVRNING TO TRVDVSHUN.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I don't pay for running water nor do I pay for any other living expenses. Where is your "earn" now?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >he doesn't pay for running water
        So someone else is. You're government property so what you want or have earned really is irrelevant, what matters is what your owner wants for you.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Kek, I thought kids weren't allowed to post on this website.

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Pits can weigh up to 130 pounds. Neither breed is officially recognized (thank God) therefore they have no standards. Both are AmStaff mixes.

    Pit Bull = Bull-Type Terrier

    Bull-Type Terriers: American Bully American Pit Bull Terrier
    American Staffordshire Terrier Boston Terrier Bull and terrier [extinct]
    Bull Terrier Miniature Bull Terrier. Staffordshire Bull Terrier

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    ITT a serb tries to appeal to americans not knowing that pitbulls are principally an african american guard dog and whites prefer the more intelligent, self preserving shepherd breeds. You are not a white american, snapshot, neither nor, stop trying to appeal to us. We hate pitbulls. They are useless dogs, cowardly protectors, too dumb to be servants, only good for attacking. The only whites who ever appreciated them were slave owners that used them to rub down escapees.

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    yes all dogs are equally dangerous just like japan and the congo have the same murder rate lmao

    genetics dont real. dogs bred for fighting and guarding do not make up the majority of the bites at all. its how you raise dem. dey din du ruffin.

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >selective breeding
    >strawman
    >strawman
    Dogs were bred to sit on their ass AND THEN go do stuff WITH THEIR OWNER, not roam around and get ran over/eaten like a cat. Go look at an alaskan sled dog farm.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Newsflash: all animals get eaten

  38. 1 month ago
    QuantumRanger

    First they will take your dogs, then your guns, then your house wont be "yours" and then you lose all of your freedom

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >your dogs
      We will take dogs from blacks, mostly. idk if you noticed but dog bans focus on what’s popular with blacks/italian mobs (now defunct), as do gun and knife bans

      taking the means of violence away from filthy peasants is a time honored european tradition and only violent peasants that dream about killing the king have an issue with it. then they eventually fuck everyone else over by being so belligerent the nation has to go full britain.

      • 1 month ago
        QuantumRanger

        >cuck ranting
        I dont know if you notice but there's 3 nigs in every corner. If you agree with the government telling what dog you can and cannot own, soon you will lose other ways to protect yourself and your house. Fuck, soon your house wont be yours. But probably you will be happy when a Black breaks into hour house, kill your parents and you will need to accept this.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I protect my house with a gun. Not a dumb fucking animal. Dogs are for third world tier idiots that can’t legally own weapons or afford security systems, you know, like serbs. And felons. Traditionally when we had them, they were beaten and chained like objects, not pets, because they were born and bred to attack people.

          America has always hated dangerous dogs and most dog laws from the east coast concern our right to execute them in public.

          • 1 month ago
            QuantumRanger

            >I protect my house with a gun
            Soon you wont be able to own guns and this will be your fault

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Ban a shitty inbred mutt
              >Somehow this has to do with guns and the right to bear arms
              If you want to classify attack dogs as "arms", then we now admit that pitbulls are not pets, and never will be. They are weapons and treated as such. A pitbull has no rights. It is hammered into working correctly with as much violence as is needed and its "feelings" are not acknowledged because a weapon does not have feelings and a weapon is not your friend. It exists to kill. A pitbull is not left in the care of any minor. A pitbull is a tool. And if it misfires, it is taken to a gunsmith to be hammered into shape or simply destroyed, and its owned is charged with negligence or manslaughter.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              My state became an open carry state IIRC last year.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Your house already isn't yours you stupid moron

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    autistic moron, no one said anything about pitbulls.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The average pitbull is only around 45lbs/20kg. Part of that is used to skate around housing restrictions on dogs over a certain weight. If someone is going to consider that “large”, you also end up banning several dog breeds actually suited for citylife.

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    wojackgays deserve death

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1: Most large dog breeds, despite numbering in the millions, kill less than one person per year. Fighting dogs, german shepherds, and rottweilers are the only genuinely dangerous ones because of their high energy level and a history of breeding specifically to attack people.

    "Need" mattering is distinctly marxist and is part of a communist slogan "to each according to his need". "NEED" does not factor into capitalist culture. You get what you have EARNED. If you want to talk NEED, you do not NEED to be posting here. You NEED to be working more hours and contributing to the success of the motherland.

    Dogs were bred to stay close to humans and move around very little, so you do not need a large amount of space for a dog to roam free. Having such space normally results in an untrained, semi-feral dog. Dogs are happiest when they stay at home and explore with a human by their side to keep them safe.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      i'm sorry, anon
      looks like you haven't EARNED enough credits for today's clean air tube
      nice knowing you, anon

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I have because I’m not a useless gay. Natural selection bitches!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Fighting dogs, german shepherds, and rottweilers
      Are you even trying?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fighting dogs, german shepherds, and rottweilers are the only genuinely dangerous ones because of their high energy level and a history of breeding specifically to attack people.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You NEED to be 18 to post here

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >dogs do not require a lot of space to roam free
      t. Never takes his lazy ass outside to walk the dog

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Instead they should be replaced by safe animals, like crocodiles and wolverines

Your email address will not be published.