Are we closer to bonobos or chimps?

Are we closer to bonobos or chimps?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    We have more similarities with the chimps

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    No idea, but I think skull shape slightly implies Chimps

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    We somehow ended up with the worst of both.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    bonobos are violent buttholes too
    the sex hippy thing is way overblown

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    whites evolved from the bonobo

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      A matriarchal society where everyone even the children get fricked constantly is a lot closer to blacks. A patriarchal society that commits organised group violence is a lot closer to "traditional" European society, though tribal petty kingdoms are possibly a little more gorilla like on the "spectrum".

      Modern white society has turned into a much more bono o like structure, while black society has become more chimp like (still a strict matriarchy)

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      whites evolved from blacks

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    As far as I'm aware we're equally genetically related to them. In terms of behavior, probably chimpanzees. There's plenty of evidence of our warring nature and violent tendencies.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I bet on chimps

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >There's plenty of evidence of our warring nature and violent tendencies.
      Plenty of examples of pacifist societies exist as well. A bunch of them got wiped though. Moriori and California natives for example.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Polynesians/Oceanics are absolutely savage warring tribes, basically the Vikings of the East. I I would think their pacifist code came from an excess amount of violence.
        Found this skimming their wiki page:
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nunuku-whenua
        >Following an intertribal conflict, Nunuku-whenua [...] established "Nunuku's Law", which forbade war, cannibalism and murder.
        It seems pacifism is not really a apart of their nature, but culture rather.
        Similarly, Amerindians were extremely savage, viscious and violent people.

        Besides the point, I think Man's capacity for violence increases hundred-fold when a state can wage wars with impunity, force citizens to pay for them and sell our children's future prosperity via central banks and collective debt.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Polynesians/Oceanics are absolutely savage warring tribes, basically the Vikings of the East. I I would think their pacifist code came from an excess amount of violence.
          >Found this skimming their wiki page:
          >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nunuku-whenua
          Yeah, they genocided the moriori, who were known for being pacifist.
          >Similarly, Amerindians were extremely savage, viscious and violent people.
          Yeah, pre-columbian warfare had some interesting customs, like kidnapping people from neighboring tribes and integrating them into your tribe.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            > Yeah, pre-columbian warfare had some interesting customs, like kidnapping people from neighboring tribes and integrating them into your tribe.
            You make it out as if that is all they did. Typical WASPs and your insistence on romanticizing indigenous cultures.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Nah, I know there were lots of tribes (aside from obvious mesoamericans/incans) that practiced human sacrifice and ritual torture. I just think the recruitment traditions are particularly weird. Capturing your enemy, torturing them, and then taking them on because you're impressed with their resolve under torture is a lot more original than plain torture.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Lowest reading comprehension imaginable.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Yeah, pre-columbian warfare had some interesting customs, like kidnapping people from neighboring tribes and integrating them into your tribe.
            And like tyeing their prisoners to a pole, blinding them, skinning them alive and then slowly roasting them before eating them, and the longer they staid alive and conscious the better.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      We somehow ended up with the worst of both.

      Thypical bullshit responses for this type of question. Human bad, what about the bad things. Animals are pure automatons devoid of original sin.

      Genetically we're either equally distant, or not in any way that matters.

      bonobos are violent buttholes too
      the sex hippy thing is way overblown

      is right, the sex hippie thing is overblown. Animals behave more or less the same way when it comes to competing for resources across the board

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *