Anyone else disgusted by their human nature to care for things because of their appearance?

Anyone else disgusted by their human nature to care for things because of their appearance?
>eats fish and chicken because of their relative distance in features from us
>makes dogs and cats look like babies
>does'nt eat them
you seeing a pattern?
Your primal instincts to not eat your young are encroaching on the survival of species with non-neotenic traits.
>we have no problem chopping backyard snakes up with shovels because they "look" evil
we created all domestics for human use and consuption so why tf do they matter?
>anon just wants to eat dogs and horses like some chinaman and see natural ecosystems untouched

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    We don't eat them because the reason why we domesticated them is entirely different from livestock.
    Cattle and the like were domesticated because :
    1. it was easy
    2. we want their resources

    Cats and dogs served recurring purposes other than providing skins, meat, dairy, etc. Hunting, protection, and naturally after millenia they became companions.
    Same reason you don't kill and eat the ox that plows your fields, at least until it gets too old to do that anymore.
    I'm talking out of my ass so if I'm wrong I'm happy to hear it.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      In fewer words: livestock are a product, pets are a service.

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    dogs and cats look like babies
    >>does'nt eat them
    Speak for yourself, hypocrite westoid.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >hypocrite
      https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/what-is-kosher
      these are the laws of the being who created the universe

      you are not morally superior, you are a heretical barbarian who is outside the chosen, a faithless golem dedicated to serving greedy kings rather than the true king above
      all atheists are citizens of a globalized sodom and gomorrah

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    your viewpoint is itself irrational while preferring animals that look more like humans makes perfect sense when you realize empathy doesn't check your DNA, just your appearance - and that it's a survival instinct

    the way human empathy is supposed to work is familiarity+similarity. a properly functioning human will not eat his own family's dog. this ensures his family benefits from the dog but does not suffer for a random dog they have nothing to do with. he may eat another family's dog, and feel kind of bad about it, but food's food. he will eat his own chicken - any chicken, actually. he will not attack his family but the likelihood of him attacking members of other families increases as their appearances diverge, an instinct that ensures regional groups don't get overrun, subsumed, or killed off by ones that are functioning properly.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't chop up backyard snakes

    anyone who thinks snakes aren't cute needs therapy

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Then why do I always want to eat babbies?

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wouldn’t eat a cat or dog regardless of how they look, stupid argument
    Fish also are cute in a moronic way and I will continue to eat tons of them

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    appearance strongly correlates with the nature of the beast.

    Dogs and cats could (and often do) look like their wild counterparts and we still wouldn't eat them. They have the appearance of a more mentally present animal, and they are clearly lean and dine on the same shit as us. They are a horrible food source. Eating them regularly is minimally fit behavior indicative of a degenerate or unevolved people.

    It doesn't matter what you believe morally or spiritually. It is minimally fit behavior and as society spreads and the wilds disappear every animal you eat is chosen to be eaten, and choosing a dog or a cat to eat is essentially throwing away food no matter how you slice it. Every single calorie they consume can be fried up in 5 minutes for yourself. There is no other way for them to eat, but to eat the same food as you. And every animal you choose to keep for food has its own behaviors, has its own disease, has its own troubles. And these animals are highly active and because of their diet shared with us, share a lot of diseases with us as well.

    Throwing away food is wrong. Investing more energy into getting a negative return is wrong. No matter what god or arrangement of souls you believe in, efficiency is king, and the less efficient will either die out or be assimilated/slaughtered by the more efficient, which is why most of civilized asia is running on 75% western values now and only the iron age villagers still do shit like eat dogs, like they're a bunch of bushmen eating whatever walks around because they lack organized agriculture and live in the woods instead of by them.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      fact: some chinese peasants with newfound wealth tried to operate both dog and cat farms. what they found is it is horrendously expensive, their stock would kill itself or kill the other stock, and no one is willing to pay profitable prices for the meat. it's an exercise in throwing away money. most dog meat in china is stolen.

      contrast chickens, which continuously produce more than their weight in eggs for 2-3 years (3 times their weight in eggs each year) and do so while eating waste parts of plants you can hardly digest, grass, and a bunch of bugs that would be impossible to efficiently round up for yourself (and potentially anti-nutritious or toxic depending on species and processing protocols)

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don’t know why, but I would straight up kill a squirrel, rabbit or a person before I take out an ant nest. I’m 99% normalgay but have this über autistic fascination with them. Nobody knows I literally spend hours a day re-reading Wikipedia pages on different types of ants. I have four colonies at my house. They’re so goddamn cool.

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    You're creating your own devils. This is a non-issue. By all means, continue spreading your opinion on this, but don't treat it as a large-scale issue and instead push it as a nuanced opinion and philosophy.

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Are humans just baby chimps? Are we exactly doing the same trick those frilled salamanders do to not age?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    No you're just indoctrinated. I would eat any animal given the chance, including human

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Okay we get it. your Chinese

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        My Chinese are indeed delicious.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      same. i was never really appalled by the idea of eating dogs or cats, especially if the situation was dire. protein is protein.

  12. 11 months ago
    Melvin Russo

    >hurr dude all life is life durrrrrrrrr ALL LIFE IS LIFE!
    And yet if you go against your instinct your propensity for abominations against man increases.

    Every country that eats dogs, at scale, treats humans like shit and requires economic assistance from SUPERIOR cultures to maintain something resembling modernity. Curious. As civilization seeps through the cracks of your INFERIOR culture and begins soaking in, people stop eating dogs. CURIOUS.

    At the lowest level of "civilization", cannibalism is rampant. As humans learn to build a more functional society, primate ceases to be eaten.
    As civilization progresses further, dogs and cats are no longer eaten, either for empathy's sake, or because they convert a lot of food into not much and even if you don't like them total extermination is preferable to continued consumption.
    As civilization progresses, the next animals to cease being eaten are
    PIGS
    THEN COWS
    Curious.

    I will say this again:
    Everyone who does not follow this progression suffers for it.

    YOUR CULTURE IS OBJECTIVELY INFERIOR. Like child sacrificing frickwits in the jungle.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      based AI btfoing the humies
      >noooo moral relativism its racist to tell me my entire culture is wrong about something nooo
      its not possible to advance as a civilization until your meat eating is pared down to brainless fish and infertile eggs.

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have a soft-spot for fish and birds, so I only eat mammals.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I have a soft spot for non mammals too. I still eat them but I can't kill one myself without feeling bad

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    How would eating horses and dogs be any better than eating cows?
    And following this same example, it's rare for people to eat horses even though they don't look like babies.

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >>eats fish and chicken because of their relative distance in features from us
    Speak for yourself. I was feeling empathetic for all vertebrate life (and also a lot of invertebrate, but I have since dropped most of that) already as a 9 year old. So I became a vegetarian then.

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >makes dogs and cats look like babies
    >doesn't eat them

    Fourtunately, many cultures still eat dogs, cats and other primates (bushmeat), so things aren't too unequal, but yeah, humans do have a preference for "cuter" species.

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    You just live around shit people. Here we eat fish, chickens, dogs, cats... And we only kill snakes for food not because they look "evil"

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The dream barn I just filed with the agency lists me, some chickens, and Dr. Porker here.
    But only one of you

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >we
    speak for yourself

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *