Any anteater chads here? What do you feed them? Any special needs?

Any anteater chads here? What do you feed them? Any special needs?

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      what the frick

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      you monster

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >anteater chads

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Remember when a giant anteater beat the shit out of Naruto?

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    hello i am le anteater :DD

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >child of an anteater and a dog

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    There needs to be some kind of service where you can have one or two hungry anteaters walk around your yard and destoy ant hills. Would be more eco friendly than poison and you'd get to see some anteaters.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Anteaters would starve to death if they eliminated entire ant colonies instead of leaving enough alive for them to rebuild their numbers.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I love anteaters so much it's unreal

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      why

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The long

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          wouldn't you love barnacles even more, then?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            anon that's some twitter logic bullshit

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Barnacles have a much longer one than anteaters or any mammals in general

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The long face and the big fluffy tail

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Look at them go

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >the babies consciously try to align their fur pattern with their mom's as a form of camouflage
          Neat

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Whats the tail for? (no meme answers)

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It uses it as a blanket when it sleeps as camouflage as protection against the sun

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Also for balance when the other half of its body is deep in a hole
            Tails are usually very useful

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I’m about to be deep in your hole but you don’t see me wagging around a tail

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    muppet baby

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I wonder what's going on behind those black souless eyes

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >eat bug

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I think we could learn a lot from this

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Shut up, Schwab

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If everybody had a pet anteater and took them out for walks, they would keep our sidewalks clean.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Don't you have the pesticide that kills ants?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        anteaters are natural pesticides that kill ants

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I love anteaters and armadillos.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      One will cuddle with you
      The other will give you leprosy

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      why not have both?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >no weird joints
        souvlless

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I dreamed of anteaters (and a weird armadillo-anteater thing) invading my house because of this thread

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Armadillos are actually the closest phylogenetic relative of the anteater.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      ?si=dRSurTvfVLV3FCsA

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Any anteater chads here? What do you feed them?
    Anon, I...

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do animals enjoy wearing clothes? They always look so cute in them, but I can't imagine the added heat is okay for them to deal with.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Cats don't due to all the pressure sensitive whiskers all over their bodies, dogs don't mind. I don't think anyone but an actual anteater chad could tell you what anteaters feel on this issue.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Anteaters come from Brazil, so they would normally feel cold for most of the year in the US or most European countries unless forced to put on clothes.

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think this could catch on. People with infestation problems would be balling out with an anteater.

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    FRICK COWS
    I HATE COWS

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is this AI? I doubt a human being would make something like this

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I doubt a human being would make something like this
        Actual human beings have drawn erotic material featuring deforestation and wonderbread, anteaters attacking a cow doesn't even register on the weird scale.
        Lurk moar.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Viktor Safonkin.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Just did a reverse image search, I think it's from 2004.

  16. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >see that anteater thread gained a bunch most posts
    >enter thread, expecting more anteater content
    >it's this shit
    🙁

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Cute anteater content, buddy

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        i am the main character/protagonist of this board, you all exist to post content i enjoy. time to start acting like it.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          He cute

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    OK..

  18. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    OK..

  19. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    OK..

  20. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why are they like this? Is it autism?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's a gnome

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        those are real??

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          What's more likely to exist, gnomes (existence documented in many cultures around the world) or some supposed biological vacuum cleaner that solely subsists on tiny ants?

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            when you put it like that…

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Gnomes aren't even a folkloric creature, they are an OC of an early modern Swiss pseudoscientist called Paracelsus.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Paracelsus was a cool bastard

  21. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    is it true these things can piss like 15 feet

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, it pisses piss

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nope, that's porcupines.

  22. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anteater if he small

  23. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
  24. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Dalí was an anteater chad.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      What is that it’s drinking off the floor

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ants

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Dali was a fascist

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Dali was an attention prostitute above all else. All of the egdy statements he made in support of fascism, Hitler, universal enslavement of all Africans, misogyny, violence towards children, he did to foment outrage and use it to promote himself. And it worked. Nobody remembers his edgelord attitude nowadays, but everybody remembers him and his works.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >There was no reason for me to stop telling one and all that to me Hitler embodied the perfect image of the great masochist who would unleash a world war solely for the pleasure of losing and burying himself beneath the rubble. I have often dreamed of Hitler as a woman. He turned me on in the highest.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        And Picasso was a communist. Your point being?

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nearly every single modern artist was a communist of some kind, this is hardly breaking news.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            And nearly everyone from the early 20th century and before was some flavor of ‘fascist’ when going by modern standards

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Dude, modern artists lived in the early XXth century.
              >and before
              Fascism =/= authoritarianism

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                > Dude, modern artists lived in the early XXth century.
                >nearly everyone
                > Fascism =/= authoritarianism
                Correct. Not always agreed upon unfortunately. Hope you feel the same about the other regimes at the time with amazingly similar views and beliefs to the actual ‘fascists’ as well as before.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yes thats why they hate it when people with actual skill and taste earn fame and when humans follow their inborn beauty standards. Contribution to society scares commies almost as much as normal and ideal human behavior for some reason.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Picasso could draw better classical portraits than any of the Nazi artists, he just thought it was boring and added nothing to the canon of fine art. He painted this one as a child.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                instead he decided to detract from fine art by showcasing mental illness, the degeneration of the human condition into something that is neither the hardy ape nor the industrious and athletic natural state of man

                Frick him and frick modern art. Modern art is literally the hatred of nature, natural concepts, natural order, natural law, and natural tendencies. The modernist declares these fallacious because they are because they are.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Everything wrought by humans is a part of nature simply because humans are. If you don't accept this thesis, then anything you declare the "natural order" is an arbitrary definition based solely on your personal biases and preferences. Art is pretty unnatural in the first place, you know. Whether it strives to reflect or defy reality, it remains wholly artificial.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >t. another midwit that doesn't understand what nature actually means
                Ugly is not beautiful. Sorry bud.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                So are you talking about aesthetic appeal or the natural order? Because nature is full of things that most people would consider very ugly. Make up your mind.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >He doesn't know
                Human beauty standards are "natural" in that they refer heavily to health and basic evolutionary fitness. Like symmetrical faces, which correlate strongly with good nutrition and a lack of mental illness, and are something we NATURALLY strive towards having NATURALLY. Natural typically means things that arise via natural processes of selection rather than midwit musings and idealist garbage. ie: THCa is a natural compound with function in controlling cell death and repelling pests in the hemp plant. The psychoactive, decarboxylated form is typically unnatural due to the foolish intervention of humans adding heat.

                Most people typically understand natural to also be normally, but not necessarily, superior, because something that is natural has most likely been subject to natural selection for enough time to prove its worth in aiding the survival of a species. Most, but not all, natural things are the best option available for whatever problem they solve.

                ie: Most people agree that intra-specific empathy is a NATURAL trait of human beings. It is therefore most likely, but not necessarily, a superior trait in most situations.

                Incorrect beauty standards or a conscious resistance to correct (natural) beauty standards could be construed as an attempt to select against health and for mental illness.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                The prevailing beauty standards are anything but natural. In fact, they seem to go directly against the basic principles of nature, regardless of the gender. Women prefer bulky and muscular dudes, but bulking up is a horrible strategy from the evolutionary standpoint. It involves wasting amounts of time, effort and resources on something that's perfectly useless for survival. You can't really get more unnatural as a man than a bodybuilder. The women suffer from the opposite extreme. They starve themselves half to death to appeal to the male preference for slender, graceful females. Mother Nature would weep tears of blood if she could see it... or would she?

                It turns out that animals across every clade sexually select for traits that are not only utterly worthless for survival, but are often actively harmful to it. Peawiener tails are the textbook example of that. They may look pretty to humans and to their own females, but they make the lives of male peawieners short and brutal. Not only do they prevent them from flying well, they also serve as magnets for the predators due to their visibility from a large distance. Not even humans have beauty standards as detrimental to their survival as that.

                Now, you would either have to concede that such a thing as "natural beauty standards" doesn't really exist, or accuse the peawieners of being degenerate commies out to destroy the natural order of things.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Women prefer bulky and muscular dudes
                Women actually prefer lanky and wiry men, every time this is studied. They want a tall man who is naturally muscular but not ripped and has physical traits indicating lifelong health and sufficient virility. It's men that prefer bulky and muscular lantern jawed dudes because that's how they select warriors to ally with - people who show natural and conscious inclinations towards violence against other humans. Intra-tribal competition is a natural part of humanity so we have two ideal male types, the provider (wiry, tall man) and the warrior (stockier, more muscular, hones himself for murder).

                >Women starve themselves to death
                To honestly signal their fecundity by emphasizing wide hips and naturally supple breasts rather than false signaling via weight gain. Women who get married and become reproductively active typically gain weight. This is the natural female beauty cycle.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Women who get married and become reproductively active typically gain weight.
                And then get dumped together with their kid because their husbands couldn't get it up with a fat sow. This is the natural female beauty cycle in a ghetto. Elsewhere, women continue taking good care of themselves after childbirth.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Historically married women had an appreciable layer of fat and people fricking loved it. They weren't cows, they were genuinely curvy.

                The universal anorexia thing is super new and created by capitalist mind control

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Historically married women had an appreciable layer of fat and people fricking loved it. They weren't cows, they were genuinely curvy.
                Correct. Women need a certain amount of body fat anyway in order to have proper working hormones and for heathy pregnancy.
                >The universal anorexia thing is super new and created by capitalist mind control
                Seems more like a commie thing

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Communists do it accidentally because their system doesnt actually work with industrial society (or atheism, marx himself must be removed for a communist economy to function), capitalists do it on purpose to sell weight loss scams because their system works too well with industrial society.

                Wait, anteaters?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                People who have actually lived in post-communist countries all remember morbidly obese grannies, sales clerks, waitresses etc. Obesity is a sign of poverty, not wealth, as it's the consequence of unhealthy diets with a prevalence of bread, cereal, spaghetti and other cheap sources of quick carbs. Besides, it's much easier for a woman to gain weight than to lose it.

                actually the joke is that they’re hungry and starving 🙂

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/sAWVB8h.jpeg

                Communists do it accidentally because their system doesnt actually work with industrial society (or atheism, marx himself must be removed for a communist economy to function), capitalists do it on purpose to sell weight loss scams because their system works too well with industrial society.

                Wait, anteaters?

                People who have actually lived in post-communist countries all remember morbidly obese grannies, sales clerks, waitresses etc. Obesity is a sign of poverty, not wealth, as it's the consequence of unhealthy diets with a prevalence of bread, cereal, spaghetti and other cheap sources of quick carbs. Besides, it's much easier for a woman to gain weight than to lose it.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                The great joke is that nature is much weirder than humans can even imagine. Like the alien species we come up with in science fiction stories are child's play compared to what some animals are like on this very planet.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                what the frick is that?? mutant deer??

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Wojak deer.
                Fact #1: they are scavengers who eat corpses and have fangs specialised for that purpose.
                Fact #2: they have the fewest chromosomes of any mammal and, in fact, fewer than a fly.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Muntjac, not Wojak.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                You don't say?!

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Oh, so you didn't just make a simple mistake and instead were intentionally misinforming someone who just wanted to know more by giving them the wrong name on purpose? Strange to double down on being a compulsive lying c**t, but you do you.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                We are reaching levels of autism that should not be possible

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                autism > your "joke"

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                newbie

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Wojak deer.
                Well Wojak or Muntjac aside, a drop in the number of chromosomes does not equate with a reduction in genetic information.

                You just have have fewer but larger chromosomes. They fuse.

                But nonetheless, it is an interesting trait.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Likewise, an increase in the number of chromosomes doesn't necessarily entail an increase in genetic information. It results in much bigger cells, though, which is widely used in agriculture to breed plants with bigger, juicier fruits. Most of the species with a very high chromosome count are plants, and the champion is a fricking protist (a little shit too primitive to classify with confidence).

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >passing genes on = good
                Read nicomachean ethics. This homie

                The prevailing beauty standards are anything but natural. In fact, they seem to go directly against the basic principles of nature, regardless of the gender. Women prefer bulky and muscular dudes, but bulking up is a horrible strategy from the evolutionary standpoint. It involves wasting amounts of time, effort and resources on something that's perfectly useless for survival. You can't really get more unnatural as a man than a bodybuilder. The women suffer from the opposite extreme. They starve themselves half to death to appeal to the male preference for slender, graceful females. Mother Nature would weep tears of blood if she could see it... or would she?

                It turns out that animals across every clade sexually select for traits that are not only utterly worthless for survival, but are often actively harmful to it. Peawiener tails are the textbook example of that. They may look pretty to humans and to their own females, but they make the lives of male peawieners short and brutal. Not only do they prevent them from flying well, they also serve as magnets for the predators due to their visibility from a large distance. Not even humans have beauty standards as detrimental to their survival as that.

                Now, you would either have to concede that such a thing as "natural beauty standards" doesn't really exist, or accuse the peawieners of being degenerate commies out to destroy the natural order of things.

                illustrates my point better than I could with the peawiener example.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            that why it's dogshit?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Here's a historical anecdote for you. When the nazis wanted to prove the superiority of their based-and-redpilled art, they organised two exhibitions side by side. One featured the modern art produced in the Weimar republic, the other, neoclassical art they've been funding. It backfired spectacularly as everybody flocked to see the "degenerate" exhibition instead of boring neoclassical crap.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, and people are more eager to watch porn than read shakespeare. They lack principles, most of them are basically monkeys that want to see new thing however bad and really want to see sex.

                That doesn't own the nazis. It actually proved them right about the state of the german people. Too bad about the part where they crammed well meanining matzo shop owners into death camps to make them pay for the actions of finacnial moguls in england and invaded poland, france, and russia for ????

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Too bad about the part where they crammed well meanining matzo shop owners into death camps
                I bet you think Hamas beheaded 40 babies and then cooked them in ovens. It is always the same atrocity propaganda with israelites. Learn to filter it out.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                sounds to me like the only thing that proves is that germany was still filled with leftoid scum from the nightmare days of weimar and thus people who would find that crap appealing

                Yes, and people are more eager to watch porn than read shakespeare. They lack principles, most of them are basically monkeys that want to see new thing however bad and really want to see sex.

                That doesn't own the nazis. It actually proved them right about the state of the german people. Too bad about the part where they crammed well meanining matzo shop owners into death camps to make them pay for the actions of finacnial moguls in england and invaded poland, france, and russia for ????

                Here's a historical anecdote for you. When the nazis wanted to prove the superiority of their based-and-redpilled art, they organised two exhibitions side by side. One featured the modern art produced in the Weimar republic, the other, neoclassical art they've been funding. It backfired spectacularly as everybody flocked to see the "degenerate" exhibition instead of boring neoclassical crap.

                What the frick does this have to do with anteaters? Frick off to /lgbt/.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                what kind of troony would care about some cringe redditmal, you must be a israelite trying to distract us from more important and relevant topics like the israelites

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >That doesn't own the nazis. It actually proved them right about the state of the german people.
                lmao. it showed that Nazis are a bunch of idealistic barely human morons with no grounding in reality. most of humanity do not care about your esoteric nonsense. and when it comes to art, Nazis truly were boring fricking morons.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >barely human morons
                careful bud, you’re starting to sound like a nazi
                wouldn’t want to be a nazi would you
                >fricking morons
                learn another word

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                What a dumb conclusion,

                sounds to me like the only thing that proves is that germany was still filled with leftoid scum from the nightmare days of weimar and thus people who would find that crap appealing

                this is probably more likely

                https://i.imgur.com/jtXyqjm.gif

                >crowds are drawn to public spectacles
                >the more grotesque the more gather to gawk
                >stay tuned, more breaking news up ahead
                superiority of artistic prowess and technical skill proves itself. awful silly exercise, that. almost as silly as your non-answer. ever been to see the circus anon?

                [...]
                huh? burgers?

                Also this

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                sounds to me like the only thing that proves is that germany was still filled with leftoid scum from the nightmare days of weimar and thus people who would find that crap appealing

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >crowds are drawn to public spectacles
                >the more grotesque the more gather to gawk
                >stay tuned, more breaking news up ahead
                superiority of artistic prowess and technical skill proves itself. awful silly exercise, that. almost as silly as your non-answer. ever been to see the circus anon?

                [...]
                [...]
                [...]
                [...]
                [...]
                Anteaters?

                huh? burgers?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                what's filesize limit on this board? 4?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                This is animal cruelty

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                how much is that in megabytes? would you like to buy a vowel?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                based anteater

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Anteaters literally t-pose to assert dominance

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Here's a historical anecdote for you. When the nazis wanted to prove the superiority of their based-and-redpilled art, they organised two exhibitions side by side. One featured the modern art produced in the Weimar republic, the other, neoclassical art they've been funding. It backfired spectacularly as everybody flocked to see the "degenerate" exhibition instead of boring neoclassical crap.

              Yes, and people are more eager to watch porn than read shakespeare. They lack principles, most of them are basically monkeys that want to see new thing however bad and really want to see sex.

              That doesn't own the nazis. It actually proved them right about the state of the german people. Too bad about the part where they crammed well meanining matzo shop owners into death camps to make them pay for the actions of finacnial moguls in england and invaded poland, france, and russia for ????

              sounds to me like the only thing that proves is that germany was still filled with leftoid scum from the nightmare days of weimar and thus people who would find that crap appealing

              >Too bad about the part where they crammed well meanining matzo shop owners into death camps
              I bet you think Hamas beheaded 40 babies and then cooked them in ovens. It is always the same atrocity propaganda with israelites. Learn to filter it out.

              >That doesn't own the nazis. It actually proved them right about the state of the german people.
              lmao. it showed that Nazis are a bunch of idealistic barely human morons with no grounding in reality. most of humanity do not care about your esoteric nonsense. and when it comes to art, Nazis truly were boring fricking morons.

              Anteaters?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >brings his anteater on dick cavett
      >just tosses it on the floor
      he's an animal abuser and I'm glad he's dead

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        My friend, he was a human abuser as well.

  25. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
  26. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Smug c**t

  27. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh? You're approaching me? Instead of running away, you're coming right to me?

  28. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bruh how is it that in America you can just own anything that breaths and keep it as a pet

    Or yeah nearly anything since 1865

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Those weren't pets those were draft animals.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      You actually really can't. Anything that's threatened or endangered anywhere is verboten, every state has their own blacklist as well, and basically anything that's capable of harming a human requires licensure - yes, even dogs in most states, though enforcement is lax. Plus anything that australia puts on their "do not export" list gets outlawed, even if it's shit like the various agamas that are both ridiculously common in Aus and very unlikely to become invasive for various reasons.

      You can hit them with your car, etc.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        We have exceptions for captive bred animals. The world is not Australia.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Anything that's threatened or endangered anywhere is verboten
        This is the most moronic thing.
        >This animal is endangered and must be protected from going extinct.
        >NOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST BREED ENDANGERED ANIMALS TO EXPLODE THEIR POPULATION AND KEEP THEM AS PETS!!!!!!!!!!!!
        Bison were rescued from the edge of extinction by bison farmers. They probably would be extinct today if it had been made illegal to eat them.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          We can follow your logic after systematically destroying the traditional chinese witchcraft trade. The great leap backward and the cultural devolution were a disaster for nature and make a few british fricks with tiger rugs look tame.

          Essentially, lifting these laws would make anything but outright no-trade-or-migration-with-china laws unenforceable and the list would quickly grow to all their cash-hungry lacky countries. Its easier to just run zoos that are allowed to breed endangered or captured animals and arrest everyone else (and their source too)

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Nah. The solution for every endangered animal is to make a resilient feral population outside it’s native context. Koalas should be a menace on eucalyptus groves globally until they learn how to knock over bins and eat trash at night. Then put the weird ones that eat trash near tourists to make them even worse. Then we send their supercharged descendants back to Australia.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Its easier to just run zoos that are allowed to breed endangered or captured animals
            I'm starting an anteater zoo.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            meh don't see why breeding them for magic nut powder would be worse than breeding them for meat

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Because most wild animals wouldn't breed in captivity, forcing the chinks to order their magic nut powder from poachers.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Sometime around 2012 in Bangor Maine a couple got in trouble for having a wallaby.
        The state finally issued them a permit and required them to build a 6 foot fence (required a building permit), give it a rabies shot every year (special expensive shots imported from a breeder in New Jersey), get it neutered (so it can't breed with other wallabies and become an invasive species in fricking Maine), build a shelter within the fenced area (also required a building permit), and it MUST be on a leash any time it's not in the fenced area or inside their house.
        Ohh and of course they had to pay some fines.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Ahhh I love my state! Never updated species whitelists for the win!

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah it's weird, especially with fish.
            They refuse to add Jack Dempsey to the whitelist even though there's absolutely no way it could become an invasive species in the state, because they can't live in cold water.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >They refuse to add Jack Dempsey to the whitelist
              I'm sorry what

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      You can’t own shit in America I have a few ducks and i keep them on the low so I don’t have to file for permits and shit.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      nah you really can’t. my dream animal is verboten even though they’re really easy to keep and domesticated, because if it escaped it’d become an non-native invasive species.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      homie you literally can't own anything here. All (mammals, fish, lizard, insects) native animals are illegal in most states. It is only enforced if you make a scene though.
      Some peta morons or similar must've slid their anti animals in captivity rhetoric into the green ideology, because every normie believes that harvesting any wild animal from the wild to for husbandry makes you a selfish tiger king narcisist who is killing the environment, thus even random minnows being illegal to catch and keep in your fish tank.

  29. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    You have to be careful or they'll end up clawing through your electrical cabinet in their insatiable search for ants.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      They only do that if they lack enrichment. You can buy them fake little electrical cabinet replicas to destroy if you have to leave them alone for any span of time.

  30. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Are you asking if anyone owns one? Is that even legal??

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's a fricking cat with a snout, how can it be illegal?

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        They grow bigger than cats and have some powerful claws anon

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          They don't grow bigger.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            there's a few different species

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_anteater

            they're absolutely capable of fricking you up considering they kill jaguars in the wild.

            • 4 months ago
              Anonymous

              Does that look like a giant anteater to you?

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                looks like a giant anteater that has yet to grow bigger

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why do their forearms look like pandas

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                why do their legs look like cher

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                pretty sure that’s one of the smaller south american anteater’s which do not grow bigger

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                OP's pic is probably this one

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_tamandua

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                here is a video of one having fun

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                its a tamandua, theres 3 types. Giant, tamandua and silky

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                The battle of forbidden cats

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              they most certainly do not kill jaguars in the wild
              the jaguar is the only big cat that has no natural predators or even game that it couldnt kill swiftly. it's literally the king of the jungle, sth the lion wished it was and to a degree even the tiger, though there are too many of them in weird places so i'm not sure.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >kill jaguars in the wild.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Cope

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Jaguars don't frick with them because they can easily kill a jaguar. But they're incredibly chill and only attack when harmed, so no, they can't kill you unless you try to kill it first.

              https://i.imgur.com/cQwyak2.jpeg

              >kill jaguars in the wild.

              ?si=MeL9YEljtv_lbrJD

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        it's not you moron
        if you keep wild animals as pets, government officials come and take it away
        at least in my country

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Sucks living in a totalitarian shithole.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            You are one that's living in a shithole. Anteaters are protected species.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Anteaters don't live in any country with a high HDI, thirdie-kun.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >officials come and take it away
          >at least in my country
          If it's China, they have it for lunch.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            They torture it to death, collect the bile and sell it as an aphrodisiac.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Is there anything the Chinese don't sell as an aphrodisiac?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                cut them some slack they need all the help they can get

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        cat

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Dem kung fu moves though

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Bro your cat looks kinda moronic. Is it ok?

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          These things can kill you btw

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            It’s easy to how. That video shows how surprisingly agile and quickly they are

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            that's why they're placating him with belly rubs from a cute asian girl (assuming, could be latina or something i guess).

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Shockingly, Brazil has a lot of Japanese people.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Jaguars don't frick with them because they can easily kill a jaguar. But they're incredibly chill and only attack when harmed, so no, they can't kill you unless you try to kill it first.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            I want some Redditor to go to Brazil to cuddle "le epic floof" only to get disembowelled on camera

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            t. ant

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >t.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            In Brazil they are infamous for killing people's hunting and livestock guardian dogs, when the dogs attack they are quickly dispatched because of their lack of self-preservation. This is part of why anteaters suffer from persecution as farmers and hunters will kill them to avoid this. Equally there are cases of hunters attempting to slay giant anteaters with melee weapons and dying to critical artery damage after being clawed. Very cool animal - see videos of jaguars being fended off easily.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              kind of just sounds like regular brazilian/third world incompetence to me

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's just machismo, and yes, it's very characteristic of Brazil.
                >"I'm such a badass, witness me fistfight a monster that routinely kills jaguars"
                >"...why can I see my own guts?"

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            dogs can kill you, horses and cows can kill you. Moot point

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Those don't eat ants.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Scary

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          holy shit it doesnt even look real when it moves around. it doesnt look like a real animal. its like a manga creature from a fantasy world.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Just gotta keep the nails short. So it doesn't gut you like a mom in an Australian mall.

  31. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's a tamandua they will eat beefs and rices + some fruits

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Anon, that's a cat.

  32. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    yeh they eat ants. Its in the name. ant-eater

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *